※ 引述《bkm1 (殷仔 加油!!!)》之銘言：
: : 你這篇跟pttccman的說法根本一樣。
: : → pttccman:當然不是，前位跑者還沒佔據下個壘包或出局前，壘包都是 09/21 16:28
: : → pttccman:前位跑者的，不管當下他有沒有摸到該壘包 09/21 16:30
這真的頗有趣, 我也想到一個例子大家指教一下:
二三壘有人無人出局, 打者打出左外野深遠高飛球被接殺, 兩位跑者都決定挑戰外野手,
外野手選擇傳三壘. 二壘跑者快球一步, 被球觸到時已經到達三壘.
那麼他是不是就safe呢, 照上面說法是不一定的, 還要看三壘跑者是不是已經到了本壘,
兩位跑者誰快誰慢很難說, 所以三壘審還得轉頭看看本壘的狀況才能判決. 我想這是不
太合理的.
我還可以找人支持我的說法, 有請藍鳥總教練 Gibbons:
http://wapc.mlb.com/play?content_id=30766821
完整問題從3:10開始, 以下片段從3:30開始:
I didn't think Jose touched the base, you know, once he touches it, it
establishes that's his base again. So you know Lawrie's out, he tagged Lawrie
and then Reyes came off the base (做出觸殺手勢) he's ... he's out, you know. So
they made the right call, I just didn't think Reyes touched the base, I thought
he went wide, you know, but yeah and Reyes said yeah I did touch so that's
the right call.
所以說, 要不是 Reyes 跑回去碰了三壘, 這三壘該是 Lawrie 的無誤.