不吵架 純討論
假設Lec率先進pit
對於戰局換胎策略會有很大的改變嗎？
Sainz可能會先不換，以免卡到。
Ham可能不換用10圈的白胎拚。
那後面的呢？per, Lando會換還是不換
—》lec換胎出來的位置會變p幾？
最後這場的P1會是誰？
紅軍的最後成績是？
有沒有人還有印象秒差可以沙盤推演一下？
※ 引述《onejoeluo (onejoe)》之銘言：
: https://www.racefans.net/2022/07/05/racefans-round-up-05-07-5/
: Ferrari chose to pit second-placed Carlos Sainz Jnr but not race leader
: Leclerc when the Safety Car was deployed towards the end of the British Gran
d
: Prix. Leclerc fell from first to fourth, passed by Sainz and two other
: drivers who pitted for fresh tyres.
: 當英國大獎賽接近收官的時刻出動安全車時，法拉利選擇讓當下第二的Sainz進站而非
領
: 先的Leclerc。
: Lec從第一掉到第四，被Sainz與另外兩名換了新胎的車手超越。
: Binotto said “it was common sense to prioritise the lead car by protecting
: track positions” at that point in the race. “There’s nothing unusual in
: this strategy, we always prioritise the lead car and therefore Charles in
: this situation. He was on fresher tyres at that point, and if he had pitted,
: our opponents would have done the exact opposite and gained track position o
n
: almost new hard tyres.”
: 比諾托表示: 在那個狀況下"優先考慮領先車的位置是常識"
: "策略沒有問題，我們一直都優先考慮領先車，因此Lec在那個位置"
: "Lec的胎當下較新(跟Sainz比?)，如果他進站，對手會反過來(不進站)而且在有新白胎
的
: 狀況下推進位置"
: “Just think of Lewis Hamilton at last year’s season finale in Abu Dhabi
: when he stayed out on track,” he added. Mercedes chose not to pit Hamilton
: from the lead during a late Safety Car period, a decision which cost them
: when the race was unexpectedly restarted in a manner which did not conform
: with the regulations.
: 比諾托補充: "想想去年阿布達比最後(出安全車時)Ham沒進去換胎"
: 賓士在比賽末段的安全車下選擇不叫Ham進站，這個決定在比賽未依常規重啟後讓他們
付
: 出了代價。
: “At the same time we decided to put Carlos on the opposite strategy in orde
r
: to cover all opportunities,” Binotto added. “If we wouldn’t have done tha
t
: split strategy, we would have risked losing the race and handing the win to
: our opponents.”
: 比諾托補充: "同時我們決定讓Sainz做相反的策略來對應所有的狀況"
: "如果我們沒有錯開策略，我們很可能會輸掉比賽並將勝利拱手讓人"
: