昨天前NTSB調查主任 Greg Feith 開炮
https://www.facebook.com/AirCrashDetective
It is sad to hear some of the “junior investigator” talking heads make a
storyline out of factoids or no facts about the 737 MAX. They embellish their
credentials to sound smart when in fact they have no clue and say things
about analyzing data that doesn’t exist....
A good friend of mine who is a former airline captain and flight safety
professional ant be the following:
“The VAST majority of the inane comments and knee jerk industry reactions on
FB and AV Herald are based on no valid nor substantiated information
regarding the MAX aircraft.
However, NO one is talking about the pilots, nor the airlines involved, nor
the training, nor the experience of the pilots. It IS WELL BEYOND time that
these direct factors are understood, investigated and considered a possible
contributor to the two distinct MAX accidents.
The accident information in news articles dated 11/28/2018 indicated that the
previous crew at Lion Air had experienced the MCAS issue but CORRECTLY dealt
with it by disconnecting the stab trim cutouts - as expected in the NNC
(non-normal checklist) yet the accident crew could not figure it out. Why the
plane was dispatched in an unairworthy condition needs to be addressed and
why one crew did and the accident crew did not figure it out the system
issues needs to be explored because the deficiencies with the accident flight
crew can be traced back to inadequate or deficient training and like suspect
pilot qualifications!”
I agree with the premise of his comments and would add that training issues
should be a focal point of the Ethiopian MAX and Atlas Air accidents.
Automation confusion and automation dependence are key factors that must be
included in all three of the recent accidents.
這邊的大概意思是
人們不應該單純的把事故起因歸咎於飛機本身的設計
而是要做綜合考量 包含人為因素 也就是航空公司是否提供足夠的訓練及飛行員是否
充分的了解這些系統等等關鍵因素
接著今天接著開砲衣索比亞當局
What is going on with Aviation Safety? The Ethiopian government “shopped
around” to find a country where the FDR and CVR would be sent because they
decided that despite being the country of manufacturer, and having one of the
best FDR/CVR Labs, the NTSB would not read out the data. At a time when an
airplane is under so much scrutiny regarding safety of flight issues, the
Ethiopian government apparently did not feel a sense of urgency in obtaining
data that is vital to both Boeing and the FAA to determine the
safety-critical issue(s) with either the airplane, the pilots, aircraft
maintenance or a combination of all three.
Instead of having critical information within hours, the aviation industry
and the world are waiting days because the Ethiopian government was turned
down by the UK and German investigative authorities and finally settled on
the French BEA. Politics like this has no place in aviation safety.
Now that the BEA (who also has a very good laboratory but are in the backyard
of Airbus) has received the FDR and CVR, the next question is when will the
data be available for analysis? Meanwhile the aviation industry and flying
public waits, and the air carriers experience the economic impact!
飛機明明是美國做的 NTSB/FAA的設備最好你不找 偏偏跑去找法國
而且搞的全球MAX停飛陪你們耗