[情報] Cruise L4自駕配備人類駕駛

作者: LimYoHwan (gosu mage)   2024-05-14 09:53:08
https://tinyurl.com/bvkhn237
簡易翻譯:
Cruise公司表示,他們將恢復採用有安全駕駛員監督的自動駕駛模式。這是因為他們去年
發生的一起無人駕駛事故後,暫時停止了無人駕駛服務,並進行了全面的安全評估。
經過評估後,Cruise決定先恢復自動駕駛,但仍然會有安全駕駛員在車內監督。這可以在提
供自動駕駛功能的同時保證乘客安全。
https://i.imgur.com/WVhDrCF.jpeg
Cruise表示,這種監督式自動駕駛模式只是過渡階段,他們最終的目標仍然是實現完全無人
駕駛。此次事故顯示,即使是先進的自動駕駛技術,在實際運營中仍需要更謹慎的安全措施

齁,cruise配備這麼多感知設備,一堆光達,也有備援系統,且通過政府法規認證可以運
行無人計程車,啊 怎麼車上又放人了,那我可以認為「人」才是備援嗎?那些光達根本
沒屁用…..
自駕的瓶頸是AI問題還是光達、硬體問題?
車版大師表示?
Starting this week, Cruise AVs will begin supervised autonomous driving in Pho
enix as Cruise takes further steps towards returning to its driverless mission
.
For the past several weeks Cruise has been mapping and collecting road informa
tion in Phoenix. Now, we will validate our AV’s end-to-end behaviors against
our rigorous safety and AV performance requirements. During this phase, the Cr
uise vehicles will drive autonomously with a safety driver present behind the
wheel to monitor and take over if needed.
Supervised autonomous driving is a critical validation phase prior to driverle
ss deployment and builds on our extensive work in simulation, closed-course dr
iving and more than 5 million driverless miles previously driven by our fleet
to ensure safe performance on real-world roads and driving scenarios. Safety d
rivers play an important role in testing the AV’s performance and the continu
ous improvement of our technology. We’ll begin supervised autonomous driving
in the city of Phoenix and will gradually expand to Scottsdale, Paradise Valle
y, Tempe, Mesa, Gilbert and Chandler measured against predetermined safety ben
chmarks.
Safety is the defining principle for everything we do and continues to guide o
ur progress towards resuming driverless operations. From comprehensive vehicle
management before our AVs depart the garage to continuous driver monitoring a
nd roadworthiness of the vehicle, we deploy rigorous safety procedures, protoc
ols and performance requirements to ensure supervised autonomous operations ar
e safe for operation on public roads.
Our safety measures and procedures are multifaceted and can be grouped into th
ree pillars:
Product Safety: Cruise AVs are fully-integrated autonomous vehicles derived fr
om the Chevy Bolt EV platform, manufactured by General Motors, and tested to v
alidate that the vehicles meet all motor vehicle safety requirements after th
e addition and installation of Cruise AV hardware (sensors, etc.). We have pro
cedures in place to ensure our AVs are appropriately maintained and that new s
oftware is thoroughly tested and validated through a measured release process
prior to deploying to the fleet.
Operational Safety: We have documented procedures and protocols in place to en
sure the safety of our fleet operations for those in our vehicles and those we
share the road with, including driver training, ongoing performance managemen
t processes, and responsible scaling of operations.
Enterprise Safety: Safe operations start with a safety-focused culture, and ev
ery worker at Cruise is empowered and responsible for the safety of our produ
ct and operations. We enable safety culture through appropriate governance, po
licies, reporting mechanisms, and regular safety training.
We are committed to partnering with the communities we serve, so whether human
-driven or autonomous, we encourage any community member to report driving con
cerns to our Community Feedback portal. When a concern is submitted, we will i
nvestigate the claim and, as needed, take appropriate action. Our feedback for
m: getcruise.com/support-center
As we continue through this journey, we look forward to working with local com
munities to jointly achieve our shared mission of making transportation safer
for all.
作者: XXXXBANG (XXXXBANG)   2024-05-14 09:59:00
我知道有家公司的Full Self Driving也是需要人類駕駛
作者: maniaque (maniaque)   2024-05-14 10:02:00
而且還是 法律上的 LEVEL 2或如一拳超人裡面甜心假面一樣,升級就要承擔額外的責任?反正不管如何,法律層面上,特斯拉算是躲得很好就是了Cruise花錢請人做安全監督員,特斯拉是車主花錢做小白鼠?
作者: stkoso (Asperger)   2024-05-14 10:48:00
無限制? 你要確定喔
作者: DSAndres (DS)   2024-05-14 12:12:00
用各種影片暗示不用人介入 但出事就是車主負責 然後出事還說只是Lv2 但Lv2就是不能宣傳「要不要介入」 Lv2就是人要全程駕駛 這就像賣保健食品但讓網紅但宣稱有藥品療效同樣打擦邊球不想負責的概念
作者: bmw530li ( )   2024-05-14 13:01:00
人家放的是員工,不像某拉用騙的放消費者去死囉
作者: moom50302 (武林三羚鱷)   2024-05-14 15:20:00
暗示哦?這個字有夠陰謀論的
作者: maniaque (maniaque)   2024-05-14 15:36:00
人家現在放安全駕駛員是要重新評估,確保安全無虞確保系統是OK 的,而不是把駕駛跟乘客當小白鼠做試驗即使特斯拉FSD在怎樣先進,終究就是 Level 2任何超過 LV2 的使用都是車輛所有人"擅自所為"看八月的robotaxi 怎樣演吧.....LV2 的 robotaxi不要被轟時,辯robo只是名稱而非功能,就跟 FSD只是名稱
作者: bmw530li ( )   2024-05-14 19:57:00
Robotaxi就是全民公測,不限車主的公測阿XDDD會尖叫就好了LoL
作者: chng8371   2024-05-15 13:48:00
Crosstalk 可能也有影響

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com