[情報] 11/25 Q&A

作者: hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)   2014-11-26 21:21:53
- Q: “Why does IS-4 have its historical gun, the D-25T, which is a joke on
tier 10, while other tanks do not have such an alternative gun?” A: “There
are already enough tanks in the game with “joke” guns”
「為什麼IS-4上面會裝一門在TX只能當裝飾燈桿的史實D-25T,其他車都沒有這種砲?」
「遊戲裡還有很多戰車的砲都只適合拿來曬衣服啊。」
- Q: “The missions for Object 260 are too tough and there will be a lot of
rigging” A (SerB): “I am already dreaming of how much butthurt will there
be as a result of bans for rigging :)”
「Obj.260的任務太難了,一定會有一堆人作弊」
(註:目前看到的參考任務如下,可能還會改,以下都是單場:
LT:8千偵傷
MT:擊毀3台至少比自己高一階的TD
HT:傷害+坦傷合計14000以上
SPG:全隊最高傷害+最高經驗
TD:8千傷害)
SerB:「別吵,我正在想到時候到底會有多少人作弊被鎖帳號之後會來哭哭....」
- Q: “Will you add bonux XP to tanks with more than 1000 battles?” A
(SerB): “…and how about for simply downloading a client, we unlock all the
tanks, give you all the premium ones along with a jar of jam and a bag of
cookies?”
「單車打一千場以上會給經驗獎勵嗎?」
「(SerB):.......我想想,你抓完遊戲我們就給你所有金幣車,附贈一罐果醬和一包
餅乾這樣好不好?」
- the fact that tanks traverse by “jerks” (unlike the fluid turret
traverse) is historical
戰車迴轉時會頓一下(不像砲塔是平順迴轉)是史實考量
- Q: “Can we expect render range to be turned to circle in 9.5 or 9.6?” A
(SerB): “Well, you can always expect anything”
「我們可以期待9.5就會把描繪距離換成圓形,還是說要等到9.6?」
「(SerB):你們當然可以期待任何事情發生。」
(譯:WIDID)
- it’s theoretically possible to change render range for each tank
individually, but it’s not needed – the balance parameter is the view
range, limited render range is a technical parameter that would be best
removed altogether
理論上可以以單車為單位來改描繪距離,不過沒必要,因為平衡係數是以視野來決定的
,把限制版描繪距離整個砍掉會最好。
- Storm states that a mod, which will identify not the shooter but only shell
type will stay legal (possible), only mods that also tell you WHO shot you
will be dealt with
Storm表示顯示彈種的mod不違規,只有會在未擊穿狀況下也顯示開砲者的mod會被禁止。
- it’s not possible for WG developers to simply get rid of the noobmeter
part of XVM (hence the idea of anonymizing players in battles)
開發組沒辦法直接把NM/XVM的數據去除掉(所以才會有玩家匿名的想法)
(SS:反正看到匿名的不是爛番茄就是裝弱的unicum,一點意義都沒有)
- developers are apparently not thinking about reducing the 25 percent RNG in
penetration
不可質疑你的25%RNG
- regarding the current announcement of Object 907 buff – Q: “Fuck this,
they should have buffed it only after the third campaign for massive butthurt.
” A: “Yea, we thought about it :)”
關於907的buff─
「靠北,你們應該在大外交競賽結束之後才宣布,然後看一堆人哭哭的」
「喔對啊,我們有想過。」
- Object 907 was buffed because it was simply too weak, now it’s okay
buff907是因為這輛車就是太弱,改完之後就沒問題了。

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com