默默地佔了8888的位子 XD
- Q: “Everybody knows that in 9.5, tanks will get a viewrange nerf…” A
(Storm): “Everybody knows, only I don’t know anything.”
Q:「大家都知道9.5要砍視距…」Storm:「就我一個人不知道。」
- apparently, IS-7 and IS-8 rear side armor are historical (they have correct
shape)
IS-7 和 IS-8 的後部裝甲（形狀）符合史實
- SerB confirms that it’s possible for a shell to pass through a hole, that
is smaller than its caliber in WoT, but: “Probability of that is somewhere
around 1 to 100k – we are ignoring that and will continue to ignore that.”
SerB 證實砲彈可以穿越直徑小於其口徑的洞，但「發生機率大概十萬分之一，我們已經
並會持續忽略它。」
- Q: “Why do you want to nerf the viewrange of 300 vehicles for the sake of
5 tier 8 LT’s? It’s connected to the “war on TD’s” and bad arty nerf. I
propose: reduce team size to 12, hardcap arty to 2 per side and take half of
their shells away!” A: “Game design by players sucks. Instead of fixing the
respective parameter you propose to change the general game rules, after you
bash us for making too big changes. Logic, logic everywhere.” (SS: the
translation of the answer here is not literal, for example the first sentence
is actually a quote, that makes little sense in English. Was trying to keep
the point SerB made instead.)
Q:「為啥你們只為了五至八階的輕坦就砍另外三百台車的視距？跟『TD世界』和亂砍自走
砲脫不了關係。我建議：把每隊人數降到十二人，限制單隊砲車不多於兩台並將攜彈量減
半！」
A:「由玩家來設計遊戲會搞砸。你在指責我們做大規模改動之後，反而建議將基本遊戲規
則全部改寫，而非更動相關參數而已？邏輯何在！」
（SS註：此處未照字面翻譯；像是第一句原文是引用，翻成英文沒有意義。試著抓住SerB
的原意。）
- T-44-85 and T-34-85M in the game? “When it’s done it’s done.”
T-44-85、T-34-85M 「WIDID」
- Coated optics is active all the time, not only when the vehicle is moving
鍍膜的效果是全程發動，不只有在移動中
- Q: “Enough with the “improving” of team battles!” A: “Well, that’s up
to you whether you have enough or not. Noone is keeping you here.”
Q:「對團隊戰鬥的『改進』已經受夠了！」A:「嗯，夠不夠要看你。沒人逼你玩它。」
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/16/16-11-2014/