- for now, amphibious tanks won’t be implemented
目前不會有兩棲戰車
- Cannoneer (a developer, responsible for historical tank research) states
that FV4202 can actually have the 105mm L7, as the 20pdr and 105mm L7 were
interchangeable (they used the same mount)
Cannoneer（一位研究戰車歷史的開發人員）表示 FV4202 其實可以裝 105mm L7；因為
20磅砲和 L7 用相同砲架。
- RU251 dimensions compared to Leopard 1: 10 percent shorter, 8 percent
narrower and 14 percent lower (for hull only)
RU251 vs Leopard 1: 短 1/10、窄 8％、矮 14％（只計入車體）
- Leopard prototype cannot be a tier 8 premium tank according to developers,
because its every version has a 105mm gun
因為配備 105 砲，Leopard 原型車不可能當八階金車
- IS-6 armor and maximum speed are historically correct, won’t be buffed
IS-6 的裝甲和極速沒錯，不會buff
- IS-4 will not get S-34 (100mm) and S-34-2 (122mm) guns, that were used on
its prototypes. Cannoneer explains that the S-34 is basically the same as the
D-10T and the S-34-2 is practically equal to the D-25T
不會給 IS-4 S-34 (100mm)和 S-34-2 (122mm)這兩門用在原型車上的砲。Cannoneer 解
釋說 S-34 基本上跟 D-10T 相同，而 S-34-2 約等於 D-25T
- the unhistoricity of tanks in the game is relative according to developers:
some players claim that 70 percent of all tanks are “unhistorical” –
developers argue that this number could be brought to up to 100 percent,
since there is practically always an unhistorical element in some tanks (such
as maximum speed)
有些玩家聲稱有七成的車都不合史實。開發人員表示，要計較的話那全部的車都算；因為
每台車或多或少都有非史實的部份
- why was WT E-100 nerfed in second test? “Because reducing the number of
shells by 1 and buffing the magazine reload time made it even strunger. No
way we want that.”
為啥二測要再砍 WT E-100？「因為就算彈匣扣掉一發，buff裝填速度反而讓它更噁心了」
- the fact that tanks need rebalance every now and than is normal: “If it
ever stops, it means we closed the project. Every online project has constant
rebalancing. Sometimes only a small one, but every project. There is no ideal
balance in the world.”
持續進行平衡很正常
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/20/20-7-2014/
開 T-25 連進七階場…換開瑪蒂達，連進六階場…再換 T2 LT，又進四階場…
……我踩到MM娘的尾巴了嗎…