※ 引述《startwinkle (星爍)》之銘言：
呃，與其看這種亂七八糟的偽科學，倒不如看一下論文數據
既然疾管署都挑明說這次的策略是參考加拿大，看一下加拿大修改「五年內無男性間性行
為者得捐血」(5-year deferral policy) 的說法
《Donor criteria for men who have sex with men: a Canadian perspective》
An updated risk modeling study using actual error rates at Canadian Blood
Services and Héma-Québec found that the incremental risk associated with a
5-year deferral for MSM was less than 1 infected HIV unit entering the blood
supply in 1000 years.
在實施五年緩捐策略的情況下，讓受到愛滋病毒感染的血液進入血品供應系統的風險，一
千年下來也累積不到一單位；事實上，加拿大在實施五年緩捐策略三年後，已經改為實施
一年緩捐策略
再看一個美國食品藥物管理局，經過十多年專家會議分析論文及各國政策後的建議
《Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency
Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products》
During the five years before and five years after a change from a lifetime
deferral to a one-year deferral in Australia, there was no change in risk to
the blood supply, defined by the number of HIV positive donations per year
and the proportion of HIV-positive donors with male-to-male sex as a risk
factor.
比較澳洲實施一年緩捐策略的前後五年，並沒有導致血品危險性上升
如果有更改捐血策略造成血品危險性上升的論文歡迎提出，那種反智的腦補麻煩省省