[新聞] 美國航空因派錯飛機導致無法降落目的地

作者: abian746 ( )   2025-06-09 15:15:25
在threads看到的文章
我把新聞PO到這來
好像是該機場只能允許788降落
AA 派789飛這條航線
導致無法降落
https://reurl.cc/1KRxEY
American Airlines passengers forced to take a bus after airplane wasn't allowed
to land because it was too big
By Updated on: June 8, 2025 / 12:54 PM EDT / CBS News
Passengers on an American Airlines flight from the United States to Italy were f
orced to take a bus to their final destination after their aircraft was forced t
o land 140 miles away because it was too big to land at the original destination
.
American Airlines Flight 780 left Philadelphia International Airport at 7:42 p.m
. local time on Monday and was supposed to land in Naples, Italy, at 10 a.m. loc
al time, according to FlightAware.
However, the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft was off the coast of Italy, about
halfway between Rome and Naples, when it abruptly turned around over the Tyrrhen
ian Sea and turned back to the Italian capital.
American Airlines told CBS News that the aircraft was forced to divert to Rome F
iumicino Airport "due to operational limitations." There were 231 passengers and
11 crew members aboard the flight.
Historical flight data shows that American Airlines usually flies a Boeing 787-8
to Naples, about 20 feet shorter than the 787-9.
After the flight landed in Rome, passengers were bused to Naples – a roughly 3-
hour journey.
"We apologize to them for this disruption to their journey," American Airlines t
old CBS News in a statement.
An aviation-focused account on X, @xjonnyc, was the first to report the incident
.
Editor's Note: This article has been corrected to clarify who first reported the
incident.
簡單來說
AA沒有跟NAP機場確認789是否放行
就直接放飛
導致沒辦法降落
只能降落在羅馬機場
之後用巴士接駁
看來這些航線
未來可能都會用XLR來飛
作者: iqeqicq (南無警察大菩薩)   2025-06-09 16:21:00
Naples:那不勒斯a.k.a.拿坡里佛羅里達州也有一個同名城市Naples佛州剛好也有一座同名的「拿坡里機場」義大利拿坡里機場僅單跑道,長2628m美國拿坡里機場有雙跑道,2012m、1524m拿坡里機場跑道2628m,比松機2605m略長叭叭!拿坡里機場沒裝EMAS!
作者: coolfish1103 (Fish)   2025-06-09 17:08:00
本來是派遣 788 然後臨時調度 789 沒發現不能落。
作者: Qoo20811 (我沒有暱稱)   2025-06-09 17:14:00
又是波音
作者: js52666   2025-06-09 17:45:00
網嘆:又是波音!
作者: taxlaw1991 (taxlaw91)   2025-06-09 17:57:00
231人不可能用XLR啦 又不是全經濟艙配置AA買了一堆788 未來應該是最大用戶 當大家都買789以上的時候就AA大買788更正:AA現在已經是最大788用戶了
作者: abian746 ( )   2025-06-09 20:48:00
南航那十架好像有問過AA要不要買,但AA覺得太貴,馬會計不想讓人家殺價所以現在還在南航
作者: pippen2002 ((EJ1547))   2025-06-10 13:28:00
Qoo20811: 又是波音
作者: alexsh (lin4h)   2025-06-10 15:35:00
看了一下外電,主要是789/788消防和救災的等級要求不一樣789第9類788第8類,NAP只拿到第8類所以這嚴格來說不是波音,是AA機材派遣的鍋
作者: ohsI (阿奇)   2025-06-10 16:08:00
當然波音錯 弄個788/789不同類 不像人家330直接out最簡單
作者: satoyama (里山)   2025-06-10 18:49:00
這機場也夠專業 馬上可以抓出這個錯 而不是降完才發現
作者: SILee (working for what?)   2025-06-11 03:13:00
樓上,搞不好這不是第一次用789了,只是這次才被工作人員注意到。

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com