[情報] GM公佈了Bolt EV 電池組的售價

作者: Scape (non)   2017-06-13 02:38:59
Bolt是GM所生產的純電動車,續航力官方宣稱為238 miles(約380公里)
售價低於4萬美元,採用的電池組為60kWh+
GM最近公布了這個電池組的售價(非成本)為 15,734.29 美元
平均每一kWh售價是262美元
假設毛利率為25%,則其成本可能為196.5美元 /kWh
GM也有透露他們向LG購買電池的成本,為145美元 /kWh
比較一下
今年2月份,Tesla透過一則影片說明他們的電池成本已經低於125美元 /kWh
而電池組成本也低於190美元 /kWh
Chevrolet發言人也特別提到
他們在銷售Volt的七年當中,在保固期內沒有因為電池容量降低而更換過電池組
意思是要人不用擔心會需要換電池
https://electrek.co/2017/06/12/gm-bolt-ev-battery-pack-price-cost/
GM lists the price of the Chevy Bolt EV's battery pack at $15,734.29 - $262/kWh
The cost of battery packs is still believed to be the main barrier in
bringing down the overall price of electric vehicles.
GM managed to bring to market the first electric car with a reasonable
price (<$40,000) and a large battery pack (60 kWh+), but it’s not making
a profit on the vehicle.
Again, the battery pack was believed to be the main reason and now we get
one more indication that it is the case based on the newly disclosed list
price of $15,734.29.
Chevrolet spokesperson Fred Ligouri confirmed the information last week
(via Green Car Reports):
“The current list price of a Bolt EV HV battery pack is $15,734.29 and
the part number is 24285978.”
To be clear, that’s the list price of the battery pack, not the actual
cost. It’s the price a Bolt EV owner would have to pay, at the
discretion of the dealerships of course, if they had to replace the pack
outside of the warranty for some reason.
Speaking of the warranty, Ligouri continued:
“The Bolt EV battery is covered by the electric-car propulsion warranty
(see specifics below) and Bolt EV customers shouldn’t expect to pay
parts costs for warrantied repairs.
In [almost seven] years of Volt sales we have yet to replace a single
battery pack under warranty for general capacity degradation, and many
owners are still reporting they enjoy the same range capability they had
when they purchased the car.
Whole battery-pack replacement is also largely mitigated by the design,
manufacturing technique, dealer diagnostic, and repair tools included to
support the manufacture, sale, and service needs of the Bolt EV, meaning
individual modules can be replaced should it be required.
In addition to the 3-year/36,000-mile Bumper-to-Bumper Coverage,
Chevrolet warrants certain components for each Bolt EV for 8 years or
100,000 miles (160, 000 kilometers), whichever comes first, from the
original in-service date of the vehicle … for repairs to the specific
electric propulsion components of the vehicle.”
While it’s not a perfect indicator of the actual cost of the battery
pack, which is made by LG Chem, it’s the best we have so far.
GM had already disclosed that it was paying LG $145 per kWh for the
battery cells of the Bolt EV. Assuming a 25% gross margin on the $262 per
kWh list price for the pack, it would come down to something like a cost
of $196.50 per kWh with a split of $145/kWh for the cells and $51.50/KWh
at the pack level costs, which would actually make sense.
I wouldn’t expect the OEM markup on the pack to be any more significant
than that considering GM confirmed losing money on the vehicle, but your
guess is as good as mine at this point.
For comparison, Tesla was talking about an overall battery pack cost of
less than $190 per kWh last year. The company claimed that Gigafactory
would reduce that price by roughly 30% for the Model 3 when it plans to
hit volume production of 35 GWh in 2018.
Most automakers and battery manufacturers are keeping the cost and specs
of their battery cells and packs close to their chests and therefore, it’
s interesting to see some of that information become public.
作者: henryliao (henry)   2017-06-13 03:09:00
保固期內...意思是過保固要花45萬台幣換....如果台灣能投入8800億研發新型車用能源儲存系統跟自動駕駛就好了
作者: ciswww (Farewell)   2017-06-13 04:20:00
需要考慮水冷成本,現在一個電池組裡面很多電池芯以外的東西
作者: sazabik (SAZABI)   2017-06-13 07:07:00
1樓,8800丟下去如同打水飄,你覺得作出來的東西媚外的島民會買單?
作者: streit (淺紫彩雲)   2017-06-13 08:16:00
8800如果拿來這樣用,一半以上會變成展間。
作者: Killercat (殺人貓™)   2017-06-13 08:42:00
這跟媚不媚外無關 我公路車三台都是捷安特就是拿了錢還搞得很爛還害人買車得買貴 這才是賭爛
作者: JEON (果然是鄉民的世界)   2017-06-13 09:07:00
這種車過電池保固就換了吧 不然風險太高了
作者: a9564208 (YOU OUT!!)   2017-06-13 09:16:00
8800億不是這樣浪費的
作者: DYE (跟腦殘爭最後都會變腦殘.)   2017-06-13 09:18:00
就是這樣浪費啊 不然要怎樣才能撒出去? 不撒出去能酬庸嗎
作者: supereva (eva)   2017-06-13 09:56:00
又不用做一個品牌出來 做重要零件外銷就很厲害了好嗎品牌一樣國外的 不會受到媚外的影響
作者: JEON (果然是鄉民的世界)   2017-06-13 10:14:00
做重要部品關鍵零件就可以了 台積電 大立光 巧新 皆是如此說實在沒必要一直強求要做出品牌 有做出來當然很好但燒了一堆錢又失敗更慘 風險高 EX:HTC
作者: DYE (跟腦殘爭最後都會變腦殘.)   2017-06-13 10:16:00
撒錢補助企業 鄉民又有說嘴點了 多好 有事幹了
作者: supereva (eva)   2017-06-13 10:24:00
所以撒錢是要收割成果的 訂立目標 沒達成的話 看是要停損 或是換廠商 或是繼續補助 當然就需要真正的專家來評估發展產業就是投資 投資當然很有可能失敗 但是你不投資? 連失敗的資格都沒有舉個例 中國訂立了2025年 ic自製率要到70%以上 這是很困難的目標 目前就是撒錢在補助 到了2025年 理論上要看成果調整政策 如果根本沒發展起來還繼續補助 被罵我想也很合理先有目標 才有補助 並且嚴格review 要是政府補助國產車廠 有設明確目標 而且有達成 那我想沒太多人會罵
作者: ritah (力塔)   2017-06-13 10:34:00
台灣人最怕過保換電池,換變速箱修引擎都還可以接受XDD
作者: chandler0227 (錢德勒)   2017-06-13 10:51:00
MTK是做車用晶片(可應用到自動駕駛) 本來就晶片起家
作者: iamspy (寧)   2017-06-13 11:21:00
零組件實力有啊 台灣汽車產業週邊算強的~中興電工的燃料電池 豐田很想要的 上個月才談簽約bmw i3的馬達~ 光陽在歐洲廠供貨的
作者: supereva (eva)   2017-06-13 11:24:00
台灣要做品牌 先天劣勢太大
作者: leaveleft (離)   2017-06-13 12:02:00
成立一家公司,叫做台灣關鍵零組件公司…這也是零組件品牌化呀!說真的可以向BOSCH看齊…
作者: iifz32 (yi yuan)   2017-06-13 14:09:00
就跟變速箱品牌一樣吧,各車廠都能用
作者: supereva (eva)   2017-06-13 14:11:00
不要直接面對終端消費者的品牌 會好一點
作者: JEON (果然是鄉民的世界)   2017-06-13 16:43:00
台灣就是個小國家(?) 我是覺得沒本錢弄大品牌 重要零件搞定就好 奢求太多太美好的幻想反而會害了自己
作者: a9564208 (YOU OUT!!)   2017-06-13 18:37:00
不然怎麼一堆賣手機的搶著自己做,好補助不拿嗎?
作者: TaiwanNeko (台灣小小貓)   2017-06-13 21:19:00
續航力380公里,要去擔心電池壽命?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com