[新聞] Tesla今年第四起車輛火災

作者: Scape (non)   2016-11-04 01:18:48
這是Tesla今年在全球第四例的車輛火災事故。
這次發生在美國印第安納波利斯
根據目擊者表示,這輛Model S以高速行駛經過交叉路口後失控撞上路旁的樹
整輛車彈起來後有很多零件飛在空中
據調查報告,駕駛是位女性,駕駛與男性乘客似乎在撞擊當下就已經死亡
這是路人拍下的起火影片:
https://www.facebook.com/mark.bates.3998/videos/10207453052549259/
當消防車趕到時各式零件跟碎片散落了至少100碼
今年的第一起Tesla車輛起火原因是在奧地利高速公路上撞擊後導致起火
但車上兩人完全無傷
第二起事故是在法國試駕過程中起火
當時電腦先警告車輛即將發生問題要駕駛將車輛停在路邊
業務與乘客都下車後過了一兩分鐘後才起火
事故原因事後調查是因為人為的電氣設備連接不當導致短路
第三起事故是在挪威,車子在超級充電站充電過程中起火
事故調查發現起火原因並不是因為充電造成,而是車內的配電箱短路造成
Tesla已經透過OTA更新軟體去預防這類狀況發生
第四起事故就是這則超速撞擊導致的起火事故(讓我想到保羅沃克也是撞樹火燒車...)
在撞擊當下就死亡可以想見車速有多快
Tesla對於如何處理電動車火災的建議是:
如果電池破裂或扭曲,或是處於高熱之中,要用大量的水冷卻電池,不要只用少量的水
撲滅後用熱成像像機監控電池至少一個小時
Tesla也提供了如何處理事故的大量文件與培訓資料在他的網站裡:
https://www.tesla.com/firstresponders?redirect=no
另外,車輛火災事故在美國高速公路上一年有17萬4000例
==============================================================================
https://goo.gl/YjGPqD
Cars catch on fire after severe high-speed impacts. That's nothing
new to Tesla or electric vehicles, but there's also no doubt that
battery fires are different from gas-powered car fires. The latest
example comes from a tragic fatal accident in Indianapolis early this
morning.
The driver and passenger of a Tesla Model S died after hitting a tree
at a reportedly high-speed. The car caught on fire following the
accident and was difficult to extinguish according to local
firefighters.
Local news interviewed a witness that said the vehicle was “speeding
when it lost control at the intersection, crashed into a tree, and
caught on fire”:
“It hit that tree and it bounced around, and all of a sudden it just
exploded, and I had to accelerate my vehicle because all the car
parts went up in the air and I had to accelerate just to get away
from it”
The driver, a woman, was pronounced dead at the scene, the passenger
in the car, a man, died at the hospital. Some reports state that it
took about 15 minutes for the rescue team to free the passenger from
the car.
Here's a video of the aftermath:
Spokeswoman for the Indianapolis Fire Department, Rita Reith,
commented on the fire:
“The car, kind of, for lack of a better term, disintegrated. The
debris field is at least 100 yards long. The batteries and the pieces
and parts from the Tesla - all which were on fire when firefighters
initially arrived.”
It's the fourth Tesla to catch on fire this year. Another instance
happened after an impact on the highway, while the two others
happened without any impact. One instance was during a test drive,
Tesla said that it was due to ‘electrical connection improperly
tightened' by a human instead of robots, and the other fire without
an impact happened while the car was charging at a Supercharger.
Tesla recommends using “large amounts of water” to extinguish a
battery fire in its vehicles and to use a thermal imaging camera to
monitor the battery for at least one hour after it is found to be
completely cooled:
“If the high voltage battery catches fire, is exposed to high heat,
or is bent, twisted, cracked, or breached in any way, use large
amounts of water to cool the battery. DO NOT extinguish with a small
amount of water. Always establish or request an additional water
supply.”
Tesla offers extensive documentation and training for first
responders on its website.
It's worth noting that 174,000 car fires were reported on US
highways last year. Of course, the vast majority had nothing to do
with electric vehicles or Tesla
作者: ck940560 (しけ)   2016-11-04 01:42:00
第二三起起火原因我怎麼覺得有點唬....高壓線maintenance能拆的接頭會有HVIL插頭接錯或沒裝好主繼電器根本不會通電第三點也是,高壓電器盒裡面會短路就是硬體有問題兩件看起來都是製造組裝時的失誤,更新軟體是想幹麻....就這麼剛好,我電腦裡正好有TESLA高壓電器盒的STP檔欸你身為一個特粉,會說出沒鎖好造成短路這種話實在不應該高壓線的插接件設計很講究的,你先去了解HVIL是什麼...至於軟體,我只能說車子電路不會設計成BMS、VCU、BCM任何一個模塊有哪個PIN亂給電就會造成短路...那段英文寫得很清楚了 就是組裝時的失誤這也不是什麼連接電器設備 會用螺絲鎖的就是電器盒內部這擺明就是品保管理的問題 說是人為有開脫嫌疑螺絲鎖的是端子,不是接頭....而連接電器設備用的是接頭
作者: a001ou (肉蟲)   2016-11-04 05:47:00
老實說原po妳自己也沒參與事故調查,也沒有相關資料與證據,那你也沒什麼道理護航的這麼大力,畢竟你都說你只是轉述新聞而已,那ck也只是依他所知發表看法罷了
作者: b642897 (bowa)   2016-11-04 06:03:00
個案處理 哈哈
作者: apple777 (apple777)   2016-11-04 06:16:00
特斯拉今年的可靠度調查中29個排25名 超慘的豪車..這ID的文章一向主觀超強 詳情請看我前面的文章特斯拉可靠度最好的評價只有平均 這ID絕對不敢跟你說光看這篇文章的評論 連瞎子摸象都說的出來 水準如此罷了講白一點 特斯拉現在還是沒辦法提高他的妥善率和可靠度當然這ID跟政客一樣 不會跟你這樣說就如我前面常說的 這人不愧是不懂裝懂還能亂扯的大師就跟他的火箭一樣 造的出來 但出事的原因還是找不到跟NOTE 7根本是超過87%像當然人家是靠著不懂裝懂亂扯走天下 誰叫人家是大師這大師有沒有護航、睜眼說瞎話 相信大家中文都比你好
作者: aimlin ( )   2016-11-04 07:11:00
就說柴油車比較安全了 懂了吧
作者: Barolo (Barolo)   2016-11-04 07:23:00
你護航什麼? 你就去看看你回ck94什麼不就知道了 何必問?你依新聞做出評論 ck94依SPT做出評論 兩者根本不衝突真的不懂你為何要這麼急著說ck94怎樣又怎樣的你信新聞沒有錯 但ck94信SPT也沒有錯 就像福斯造假被抓前肯定有一堆人信福斯 有人信相反的實驗結果 如今證據確鑿那些當初信福斯的依然沒錯 因為他們是被福斯騙的 所以你真的不需要為了不同意見急著跳腳 畢竟人家也是有所憑據
作者: chandler0227 (錢德勒)   2016-11-04 08:57:00
驅控器不是剛好在馬達的另一側中間隔著齒輪箱嗎?這種大電的東西一般人哪會動到 就算是組裝失誤也是車廠組裝時產生的吧Tesla講求開發產品週期短更新快 會這樣好像也是可以預見的這台組裝靠人其他靠機械? 別鬧了又不是prototype
作者: apple777 (apple777)   2016-11-04 09:28:00
人家是瞎子摸象 亂扯一通剛好而已 還有評價最慘的X呢S評價是平均 X則是....慘 人家越來越進步了呢特斯拉最有名就是自動化程度很高 還在那邊瞎掰人工組裝
作者: chandler0227 (錢德勒)   2016-11-04 09:34:00
到底是車廠還3C廠? 大電的問題耶產品週期短 測試不完善 潛在問題多
作者: apple777 (apple777)   2016-11-04 09:44:00
瞎掰大師又一最新亂扯力作 不考慮去當政客嗎?
作者: chandler0227 (錢德勒)   2016-11-04 09:44:00
幹嘛寫信問 就當面問過工程師了 官方回答是在矽谷的造車公司 問題是那產品週期像3C 但車規測試要擠在這麼短的產品週期內做好根本難 怎麼達到車廠該有的可靠度?說的是產品開發週期,Tesla一款新車型開發時間比傳統車廠縮短不少
作者: apple777 (apple777)   2016-11-04 10:08:00
平均"以上"?倒數第四名的確很高 果然是睜眼說瞎話大師
作者: dslite (呼呼)   2016-11-04 10:12:00
不可質疑你的電動教
作者: apple777 (apple777)   2016-11-04 10:12:00
大師 可靠度都倒數了 還可以掰最好喔?黑的都可以凹到白的 最近剛出的排行也可以掰成這樣
作者: endless0121 (囚鳥不要開招 開招時機?2)   2016-11-04 13:34:00
至少這起沒什麼麼爭議 高速自撞什麼車都可能火災@-@

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com