[情報] Storm Q&A

作者: WillieHuang (Willie)   2014-12-08 22:19:21
這篇是 12/6 的文章,所以請搭配 12/5、6 Q&A 服用
我只是想翻個人任務相關的回答而已 wwww
- individual missions (I translated the name from Russian IBZ –
individualnye boyevye zadachi) were official renamed to “personal missions”
individual missions 更名為 personal missions
(譯:反正都翻成一點也不『個人』的個人任務)
- Q: “personal missions are there not for your fun, but to make you play it
a longer!” A: “Yes, we’ll make you by force! By pointing submachine guns
at you!”
Q:「個人任務根本不是做出來娛樂的,而是逼你玩久一點!」A:「沒錯!我們還會拿槍抵
著你的頭逼你玩!」
- Storm explains the presence of platoon requirements in personal missions: “
The name is personal missions, not individual. There are generally only a few
missions with platoon requirement. Platoons = socializing. A player who is
socializing plays significantly longer.”
Storm 解釋組排限制的存在意義:「這是個人任務,不是單人任務。基本上也只有少數
任務需要組排。組排就是交流,會交流的玩家明顯地會玩的比較久。」
- it’s apparently not possible to move the names of tanks on the improved
minimap to the left from the icon, as it cause graphic glitches
無法把小地圖上的車名移到標誌左邊;會造成繪圖錯誤
- a render range rectangle was not implemented into the new map because it
will change to a circle relatively soon
(舊聞,略)
- viewrange circle was not implemented because it exists as a mod anyway and
who really wants it can use a mod
不做視距圈的原因在於已經有MOD了,想用的人請去裝MOD
- FV4005 characteristics are not final
FV4005 的數據還會改
- there is a serious (and common) bug on test server, where – after you quit
the battle – you see that battle’s minimap in the hangar (SS: and you can
watch how the battle is going in the hangar, actually I think it would be a
neat feature)
(測試服的 bug,略)
- Storm thinks that the platoon requirement for missions is final
Storm 認為任務的組排限制已是定稿
- Storm confirms that the Mittengard map is lowtier only (SS: why the hell
does it have an encounter mode then) and that Gost Town will not appear in
random battles
(舊聞,略)
- Storm states that you don’t have to play artillery to complete the
personal missions
(舊聞,略)
- Storm commenting about players raging that they have to platoon for the
personal missions: “Yea, it’s the righteous anger because in order to get
the reward, you will actually have to make some effort. Everyone just wants
free stuff.”
Storm 評論玩家怒反組排限制的情況:「要求他們為了獎賞而做些努力;對此憤恨不平還
真是好棒棒。大家都只想要躺著領免費禮物。」
- Q: “Forced socialization sucks!” A: “Tell that to the Blizzard guys.”
Q:「強迫交流遜斃了」A:「跟玻璃渣抱怨去」
- Q: “Why can’t you make the missions pop in automatically, like
achievements?” A: “We don’t want to have players ‘getting the missions’
just so. In order to get the tank and other rewards, you will have to make a
certain effort. If you are too lazy to make the effort, you can continue
playing like you did without paying heed to the missions.”
Q:「為啥不將個人任務設為自動啟動?」A:「我們不想讓玩家不知不覺下完成任務。想獲
得獎賞總要做些努力;若你懶得去手動啟動,大可當這任務不存在繼續開心玩。」
- Storm states that WG doesn’t want to implement lighter and lighter tanks
without armor. It’s just that “choosing future branches is a complicated
question.”
Storm 表示不想做更輕的無裝甲戰車。因為「規劃未來的科技樹是個複雜的問題。」
(譯者:不是很懂這條想表達什麼…)
- Storm confirms that the missions are not balanced yet
個人任務數據尚未平衡
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/06/storm-qa-2/
作者: batterykugua (battery)   2014-12-08 22:25:00
SerB只是很troll Storm跟著學壞後還真看不太下去...

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com