Fw: [問題] 30/60規則是不是已經改成90天了

作者: bruce0428 (bruce)   2017-10-04 15:10:20
※ [本文轉錄自 Immigration 看板 #1Pr7ZsoH ]
作者: bruce0428 (bruce) 看板: Immigration
標題: [問題] 30/60規則是不是已經改成90天了
時間: Wed Oct 4 14:00:17 2017
https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030209.html
(2) (U) Inconsistent Conduct Within 90 Days of Entry:
(a) (U) However, if an alien violates or engages in conduct inconsistent
with his or her nonimmigrant status within 90 days of entry, as described in
subparagraph (2)(b) below, you may presume that the applicant's
representations about engaging in only status-compliant activity were willful
misrepresentations of his or her intention in seeking a visa or entry. To
make a finding of inadmissibility for misrepresentation based on conduct
inconsistent with status within 90 days of entry, you must request an AO from
CA/VO/L/A. As with other grounds that do not require a formal AO, the AO may
be informal. See 9 FAM 304.3-2.
(b) (U) For purposes of applying the 90-day rule, conduct that violates or
is otherwise inconsistent with an alien’s nonimmigrant status includes, but
is not limited to:
(i) (U) Engaging in unauthorized employment;
(ii (U) Enrolling in a course of academic study, if such study is not
authorized for that nonimmigrant classification (e.g. B status);
(iii) (U) A nonimmigrant in B or F status, or any other status prohibiting
immigrant intent, marrying a United States citizen or lawful permanent
resident and taking up residence in the United States; or
(iv) (U) Undertaking any other activity for which a change of status or an
adjustment of status would be required, without the benefit of such a change
or adjustment.
(3) (U) After 90 Days: If an alien violates or engages in conduct
inconsistent with his or her nonimmigrant status more than 90 days after
entry into the United States, no presumption of willful misrepresentation
arises. However, if the facts in the case give you reasonable belief that
the alien misrepresented his or her purpose of travel at the time of the visa
application or application for admission, you must request an AO from
CA/VO/L/A. (See 9 FAM 302.9-4(C)(2)).
根據9/27日的最新規則
原來30/60的規則是不是已經改成90天了
想利用ESTA入境美國調整成綠卡的作法
都必須等到overstay之後才能進行
作者: yuhung (MimiBao)   2017-10-04 16:19:00
嚇一跳...我還以為AP延長到90天(雖然說我已經等快70天了QQ
作者: cchris (cruising Panama Canal)   2017-10-05 04:38:00
不是,你可以爬我之前的推文回覆。依然正確
作者: bruce0428 (bruce)   2017-10-05 10:38:00
是因為這個備忘錄 只適用CP流程嗎?
作者: cchris (cruising Panama Canal)   2017-10-05 12:00:00
對。國務院負責cbp及領事館的業務
作者: bruce0428 (bruce)   2017-10-05 18:20:00
那USCIS的規則哪裡可以看的到? 他們不是也參考這個在背包客棧看到許多人不知所措 不知該回台改走CP雖說有移民法庭的判例 但大家都希望平順一點總不能都要讓律師大賺 打移民官司 雖說有打贏的機會
作者: cchris (cruising Panama Canal)   2017-10-05 18:30:00
我這幾天還沒空去背包客棧澄清。(我是版主)總之,不需要律師。不需要打官司。uscis不變

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com