https://tinyurl.com/ybk8cnnx
Brain Game: As Nadal Looked Right, Djokovic Attacked Left
腦力遊戲：當納達爾顧右邊的時候，Djo攻擊左邊
納達爾一些有趣的數字
進決賽前 對上Djokovic
底線得分率： 59% 29.5%(26/88)
正拍得分/失誤： 100/116 11/28
反拍得分/失誤： 33/NA 3/21
一發進球率： 64% 69%
一發得分率： 81% 51%
The theory is simple. Nadal is the best player in the world at running around
his backhand in the Deuce court and upgrading to a more potent forehand. With
Nadal always looking to protect to the right, Djokovic attacked to the left.
納達爾是最會將反拍升級成反身正拍的人，當納達爾想顧他的右邊時，Djo攻擊左邊
從上面的數據可以知道，納達爾進決賽前相當拿手的正拍、反拍和發球全部都被完封
號稱要在4拍內解決對手的納達爾，這次在決賽遇到了一面牆
Rally Length - 2019 Australian Open Final 納豆勝率
0-4 Shots = Djokovic 49 / Nadal 35 (Djokovic +14) 41.7%
5-8 Shots = Djokovic 18 / Nadal 11 (Djokovic +7) 37.9%
9+ Shots = Djokovic 22 / Nadal 7 (Djokovic +15) 24.1%
無論來回對抽多少拍，納達爾都慘敗
不過的確0-4拍的勝率算高了
所以打法也不能算錯
跟費打囧避免長拍的道理差不多
當打法像費的時候，輸的方式也很像費
還有一些有趣的數據
What bites hard for the Spaniard is that he made four first serves on the
five break break points he lost, highlighting how Djokovic consistently
turned defence into offence in the final.
納達爾被破發的5次中，有4次一發都進球。面臨破發點的時候他的發球正常
卻還是被破
Nadal had been dominant against second serves to the final, including winning
a dominant 70 per cent against Greece's Stefanos Tsitsipas in the
semi-finals. That number fell off a cliff in the final, as the Spaniard won
only three of 19 second-serve points against Djokovic.
納達爾上一輪對上Tsitsipas的二發時勝率高達70%
對上Djokovic的時候只剩15.8% (3/19)
真的非常的慘
反觀
Djo的一發勝率80%
Djo的二發勝率84%
2發勝率比1發高到底是什麼鬼？
簡單的說，納達爾身上並沒有一個武器能夠對Djo佔上風
導致最後沒有武器可以用
相對於其他選手雖然缺點很多
但至少有一項強於Djo的武器如發球、正手拍等
所以反而有時候可以造成Djo的麻煩
當然也只是造成一點麻煩而已
畢竟Djo可以攻擊你的弱點，而他你卻沒有弱點可以攻擊
接下來的法網不知道納達爾的優勢還剩多少了