[討論] 非限定關係子句若無連接詞則省略動詞?

作者: pongxpong   2018-04-26 20:04:30
最近在找文法問題時連結到了知識家某人的回答,原網址如下:
https://tw.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20140813000010KK09393
僅節錄我要問的問題重點如下:
(2) 既然句子與句子一定要有連接詞,那我把其中附屬的那一句(比較屬於補充資訊的那
一句) 的結構破壞掉,變成不是句子,不就OK了? (切入點:沒有動詞就不是句子了,那
我們就把動詞改成分詞,主動用Ving, 被動用pp)
I have two brothers, both of them are doctors. (x)
I have two brothers, both of them (being) doctors. (o) being因為不影響句意所以
通常省略
你問的one of them vs one of which,道理完全一樣
ex. The country has many mountains, one of them attracts many visitors. (x)
The country has many mountains, and one of them attracts many visitors. (o)
The country has many mountains, one of which attracts many visitors. (o)
The country has many mountains, one of them attracting many visitors. (o)
(Ving如果是"現在分詞" 在英文裡是相當於形容詞喔)
2014-08-13 23:05:30 補充:
比較有挑戰的例子:
Many people died in the earthquake, some of them buried alive. (o)
=Many people died in the earthquake, and some of them were buried alive. (o)
=Many people died in the earthquake, some of whom were buried alive. (o)
我的問題在於過去沒有看過這個非限定關係子句裡可以把動詞省略掉的用法
請問這個用法是正確的嗎?
如果是的話這個文法觀念叫什麼? 我要用什麼關鍵字搜尋可以找到相關的資料?
謝謝!
作者: NenaPolyglot (un NovioGuapo de Espana)   2018-04-27 18:44:00
這是分詞構句無動詞的"獨立結構"用法,省略了being+ present participle (V. ing)或 past participle (V. ed)連接詞 “and" 去掉後省略了 being

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com