Re: [討論] 所謂的開發強者是怎麼樣子的?

作者: oopFoo (3d)   2022-11-15 07:47:12
一個週末寫TensorFlow或可以救火幾百次的。那是神人,我們凡人作不到,也不適合我們參考。
我記得 "Mythical man month"有提到,一個專業程式師一天平均寫10行程式。
那如何有效率利用這短短的幾行程式才是重點。
那如何成為有效率的0.1x工程師?
https://benjiweber.co.uk/blog/2016/01/25/why-i-strive-to-be-a-0-1x-engineer/
https://tinyurl.com/y62xeak3
這篇很好可以看看
最重點
Let’s not build that feature.
( Is there existing software that could be used instead?)
Let’s not add this functionality.
( Does the complexity it will introduce really justify its existence?)
Let’s not build that product yet.
( Can we first do some small things to test the assumption that it will be
valuable?)
Let’s not build/deploy that development tool.
( Can we adjust our process or practices instead to make it unnecessary?)
Let’s not adopt this new technology.
( Can we achieve the same thing with a technology that the team is already
using and familiar with? “The best tool for the job” is a very dangerous
phrase.)
Let’s not keep maintaining this feature.
( What is blocking us from deleting this code?)
Let’s not automate this.
( Can we find a way to not need to do it all?)
一個凡人能寫的文件,程式都有限,如何取捨是我們需要好好考慮與學習的。
作者: GALINE (天真可愛CQD)   2022-11-15 11:42:00
目標正確,但是 refactor 的很粗暴,常見的老人新人衝突..
作者: KAOKAOKAO (鬼斗)   2022-11-15 11:47:00
推。Gene Kim: 任何在非瓶頸上的最佳化成效都是幻覺。
作者: brendonfish (fish)   2022-11-17 23:52:00
推這篇
作者: vvind (wind)   2022-11-19 15:13:00
作者: purplvampire (阿修雷)   2022-11-21 17:41:00

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com