Re: [心得] 反思程式革命的瘋狂。

作者: NDark (溺於黑暗)   2016-05-10 20:24:17
※ 引述《Lordaeron (Terry)》之銘言:
: 1.毛澤東語錄 Refactoring
: 2.毛澤東像章 Design Patterns
: Design Patterns是個人崇拜的另一種表現形式。革命初期,從主管到碼農,
: 人人必戴(「黑五類寫COBOL的」沒有資格戴除外),以表示對
: Design Patterns的敬仰。據估計,文革期間共生產了XX億本各式各樣的
: Design Patterns書籍,廠商機關爭先恐後,推出更精緻更豪華版本。
剛好看到一篇有相同批判,引起激烈討論的文章給各位參考看看
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/agile-dead-matthew-kern
在其中作者(他舉了很多敏捷創始者的說法佐證)也認為敏捷變得像是宗教及炒作商品
節錄部分如下
Agile Software Development work is
dead. If you practice that, you are a doorstop. If you manage that way,
you are a boat-anchor. The wave has ended, it is over, ...
... Who said Agile is dead?
The founders of Agile and its practitioners said it,
我告訴你敏捷開發已經死亡了。假如你正在團隊中套用敏捷開發,
你本身就是專案的阻礙
。敏捷開發的潮流已經走到終點。...
...誰曾經這麼說過(敏捷已死)呢?敏捷的創立者及他的實行者都這樣說。
There was a sacred mythology, strange terminology, special sacred tools and
other weird cult behavior. (For example many Agile practitioners are
bullies, and want to browbeat you into agreeing with them. They will attack
you or undermine your credibility when you disagree...
曾經有一個神聖的方法學,奇怪的名詞,特殊的禮拜工具,以及其他奇怪的儀式。
(打比方說很多敏捷參與者就像是教堂長老,他們會認為你應該要認同他們。
當你不同意時,它們會攻擊你,逐漸削弱你的發話權...)
However the Agile Manifesto should be replaced with reputable research
findings and serious management. This “manifesto" eschewed all management
and engineering rigor in favor of laziness. Some of it should probably also
be burned, buried and then a very big rock placed on top. Then a warning to
future generations should be carved in the rock. ‘Something like “Naive
oversimplified management ideology does not sell services forever,...
然而敏捷的那些宣言應該被知名的研究發現及嚴肅的管理學所取代。那些宣言因為懶惰
的原因避開了管理及工程的檢驗。其中的一些甚至應該燒掉,埋葬,用巨石鎮壓,然後把
這個警告刻在石頭上:天真地過分簡化管理,...
Agile became a brand-name, with marketing hype. It therefore became subject
to the rules of all such hyped products....
敏捷已經變質為一個招牌,還是一種行銷的炒作。它只是波潮流所推送的產品中的品項。

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com