※ 引述《Wojnarowski (@wojespn)》之銘言：
: “I always love a Big 2,” Paul said. “I don’t really love a Big 3... People
: talk Big 3, but the Big 3 thing has never really worked. And you’ll say, ‘W
: ell, what happened in Miami?’ That wasn’t really a Big 3. There was three gu
: ys that went in the lottery, and they did really well individually on their te
: ams, so they put up big numbers and had big accomplishments.
: 富保羅：我一直喜歡稱呼雙巨頭，我不太喜歡說是三巨頭，人們談論三巨頭，但三巨頭從
: 未真正起作用。你會問他們發生了什麼事？那其實並不是三巨頭。有三個人參加了選秀，
: 他們在各自的球隊中表現非常好，因此他們的數據很出色，成就斐然。
: "But when you think about it, Bosh was just the ultimate professional," Paul a
: dded. "He took a backseat ... he had such a high IQ, and he was such a profess
: ional as an individual. His approach to everything is what made that work.”
: 但仔細想想，Bosh才是最職業的。他退居二線，扮演著重要的角色，因為他的智商很高，
: 而且他個人非常專業。正是他對待一切事情的態度才使得這一切成功。
: 富保羅談論片段：
: https://x.com/sports_legacyy/status/1912267706646098341?s=46
: 短評或心得：
: Bosh不算？

作者: roger2623900 (whitecrow)   2025-04-17 00:34:00

所以上一篇I always love a Big 2,” Paul said.“I don’t really love a Big 3. 這不是他講的？我被誤導？觀望是不是富保粉濾鏡太重想必留言的都不懂英文吧？*原影片