The Pool Report interview was conducted by Jace Frederick (Pioneer Press)
with Crew Chief Tony Brothers following tonight’s Lakers at Timberwolves
game.
QUESTION: Why was the LeBron James shot with 2.3 seconds to play ruled a
two-pointer instead of a three-pointer after video review?
BROTHERS: The play was ruled a two-point field goal on the floor during live
play. After video review, there wasn’t clear and conclusive evidence to
overturn it from a two to a three, and that’s why it stood as a two-point
field goal.
https://twitter.com/NBAOfficial/status/1741316936330301886
賽後裁判Tony Brothers被詢問說為何LBJ的2.3秒關鍵出手的進球在看完重播後為何是
2分而非3分
Brothers回應說這個進球一開始是判2分，並且看了重播後沒有明確的證據可以推翻判決
改判3分，所以還是維持原本2分的判決
結論就是該審的都審了，所以裁判就維持原判了
話說NBA為啥都不裝輔助判決之類的 不是重播那種勾天頂竟然有嗎 我怎麼記得還是有誤判的案例
沒有明確證據能推翻=我不知道！？看不出來是3分也行啊
一堆高科技攝影然後看不出來，就大膽說沾到毛邊也好沒有明顯沒踩線的證據找不到有踩線，就是用沒有沒踩線。雙重否定，可以
作者: ioioioaoaoao 2023-12-31 13:11:00
誰判兩分的，誰負責！
作者: linchihsiang (翔) 2023-12-31 13:22:00
所以如果一開始判三分 換灰狼挑戰看不出來的話 還是維持原判裁判：啊 你是不會站遠一點
Cade勾天頂的換成老詹也會這麼熱鬧嗎一樣沒有足夠證據推翻原判
沒證據推翻判決=\=窩不知道啊。。。就是一個很正常的回放判決，不知道為什麼燒起來