https://x.com/officialnbarefs/status/1717585075531812968
We missed the foot to foot contact which should have resulted in a personal foul
and reviewed for flagrant. Had no foot to foot contact existed, this type of se
condary and theatrical movement by Brunson would meet the criteria for a non-uns
portsmanlike technical foul for flopping. It is possible to have a foul and a fl
op on the same play, but the foot to foot contact is what causes Brunson’s move
ment and no flop should have been called.
我們漏掉了腳與腳的接觸。這本來應該是個犯規+該被重新檢視是否為惡意犯規。然後在沒有
腳部接觸的前提下，Jalen Brunson這種二次且帶有演技成分的動作符合違反體育精神犯規假
摔的標準。犯規與假摔是可以同時存在的，但腳部的接觸造成Brunson做出該動作因此Bruns
on不應該被判為假摔。