※ 引述《Pash97143 (四葉天下第一)》之銘言：
: https://twitter.com/ShamsCharania/status/1624813135164239872
: The San Antonio Spurs are releasing forward Stanley Johnson, sources tell @
: TheAthletic @Stadium. Johnson had a strong stint for the Spurs this season,
: shooting 45 percent from 3-point range, and will now look to join a postseason
: contender.
: 心得: 哭啊
https://twitter.com/EricPincus/status/1624823785336590337
Here's the direct CBA language:
"If a Team trades a player and the assignee Team subsequently places the
player on waivers, the assignor Team shall not be permitted to sign the
player to a new Contract"
A waiver by a second trade, that's not the assignee Team
In the case of Stanley Johnson, he was traded from LAL to UTA, and the Jazz
as the assignee team waived him. Had they traded him to a third team that
then waived him, the 3rd team would not be the assignee team, circumventing
the restriction
So by that reading, the Lakers cannot sign Stanley Johnson. In a case like
this, if the Lakers had interest, they "should" call the league to verify.
Sometimes the NBA has a different interpretation than what seems logical by
the written word in the CBA
剛在BleacherReport記者Eric Pincus的推特，看到個滿有趣的推文。
說照CBA的規定(Zydrunas Ilgauskas rule)，一支球隊(轉讓人)把個球員，
交易到下家(受讓人)後被裁，當初交易該球員的球隊，不得在同一季把這球員簽回。
儘管Stanley Johnson當初被湖人交易到爵士，然後被裁後馬刺隊撿走，但照上面
字意上的規定，湖人(轉讓人)和爵士(受讓人)的情況都沒改變。
並沒有馬刺簽完Stanley Johnson又釋出，讓馬刺變受讓人。
湖人若真想把SJ簽回，應該致電到NBA總部確認一下，有時候NBA官方對解釋cba條文，
和其他人有所不同。
感想: 希望SJ還是有球隊肯簽他，加強板凳深度。