https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FP6I_wHXoAA_XI9.jpg
https://reurl.cc/nEkgpD
I don't understand why this is such an argument to be honest. I really don't.
It's not that close. You look at the three leading candidates... they start
talking about team victories. Jokic has been on the floor for more wins than
either one of those two guys.
我不太懂為什麼還有那麼多爭論的空間老實說。我真的不理解。
差距並不小。如果你去檢視三位領跑的候選人...
他們開始從團隊勝利討論。Jokic在球場上比其他兩位拿下了更多勝場。
Jokic has played in 45 wins, Embiid 44, Giannis 43.
（截至4/8）
If you look statistically, he leads them across the board, all the analytical
categories he's No. 1. Including defensive box score plus-minus and defensive
win shares. He's ahead of both of those guys... then he's ahead of them in
rebounds, assists, steals, EFG%, TS%... I just don't really know how you can
make a good objective case for one of the other two guys.
而如果你從數據面上看，他幾乎在所有的數據別都領銜第一。
甚至包括防守 box score 正負值，防守WS值。他領先其他兩位候選人...
所以他的防守不是一個議題。
然後他還在籃板、助攻、抄截、EFG%、TS% 這些環節都領先......
其他競爭者贏過他的大概是火鍋，還有得分。大概就這樣。
Embiid 在三分命中率和罰球命中率更勝一籌，但其他所有數字都是 Jokic 占優。
我是真的不知道，要怎麼替另外兩位候選人做出類似這樣較好的客觀論述。
By Stan Van Gundy