消息來源：https://goo.gl/7iBCZA
內容：
The NBA has a hard rule during altercations: Any players who leave the bench area receives a one-game suspension. Intent doesn’t matter.
It’s not negotiable. The league simply doesnt want more players entering a fracas.
Russell Westbrook found a gray area last night.
The Thunder star was waiting to check into Oklahoma City’s Game 4 loss to the Jazz when Raymond Felton fouled Rudy Gobert, um, unpleasantly.
Gobert and Felton got into it, though not immediately. Once they did, Westbrook walked onto the court, and he and Gobert swiped at each other.
Gobert and Felton eventually received technical fouls. But could harsher punishment be in store, especially for Westbrook?
Andy Larsen of KSL.com:
"A pool reporter request to the game officials to ask them about the play was initiated, but the NBA indicated that the officials wouldn't c
omment on the matter because it would be reviewed by the league’s disciplinary committee."
The key question should be: Did a referee already beckon Westbrook into the game? If one did, Westbrook shouldn’t be suspended. If none did,
Westbrook should be suspended. The league will talk to the refs and get a better understanding of what happened. Their account matters most.
But one indicator working against Westbrook: Steven Adams – whose toughness is beyond reproach – was also waiting to check in and stayed
on the sideline. If Adams had already entered the game, wouldn’t he have gotten involved? Maybe not, but his hanging back is circumstantial
evidence pointing toward a Westbrook suspension. Again, though, the referees’ accounts matter far more.
大意：
西河在第四戰的時候疑似離開板凳區。 在Felton對Gobert犯規後，雷霆準備把他換上場但又還沒真的上場。後來Gobert跟Felton衝突後，他衝上來加入戰局
現在聯盟正在調查，看到底西河在場上是不是裁判允許的。
補充：https://goo.gl/Mr5N8Y <- 判決已出 沒被禁
短評或心得：好像太衝動了？