消息來源：(網址或出處)
http://www.rantsports.com/nba/2014/06/05/metta-world-peace-blog-tim-duncan-should-be-nba-mvp/
http://ppt.cc/g2X0
阿平的體育專欄(WTF!?)
內容：
With all that said, compadre, Tim “Dunkin” Duncan, or Tim “Layup” Duncan,
is the MVP. He is everything that Durant will be. These two are different,
but similar. I admire them both. But when we are talking a team’s most
valuable player and the only team with 60 wins or better, we are only talking
Tim Duncan or, as Tim might say, the Spurs.
說了那麼多(指的是前文關於KD媽媽很偉大的部分)，
人們口中的石甜甜圈佛(好啦 我相信他的意思是石灌籃佛)
或著石上籃佛才是MVP。他將會是KD的未來榜樣
倆人很相像但是有些許不同，我同樣讚賞兩人
不過當我們談到一個隊伍的最有價值球員的時候
而那個隊伍又是唯一一個六十勝的隊伍
我們只會想到石佛，或著說.....馬刺
Duncan also was the only player this season who said his team will win the
Finals. Why are players so cautious to back their words up? Not even King
James came out with such a statement. These are things that make an MVP. And
to win four titles while chasing down and gaining ground on Kobe’s five, how
can Tim not be the MVP?
Sometimes boring is better.
石佛也是唯一一個在常規賽的時候，就認為自己的球隊是會奪冠的隊伍
為什麼球員敢這麼認為?就算是小皇帝也沒有信心這麼篤定的說他會奪冠
這個事情就已經是最直接支持他是價值球員
在爭取第四個MVP的同時也在追求和老大並肩的第五冠，石佛怎麼會不是MVP?
有時候，越簡單無聊的反而越厲害
短評或心得：
抓到了，TD拿不到MVP的原因是因為阿平支持TD
(這篇文是昨天發的，不是預測文)