[外絮] Mark Jackson 執教手冊 (下)

作者: Yukirin (いい天気!)   2013-11-23 22:54:31
nypgand1大先翻了上半部,我還挺喜歡的就自己先翻了下半部了XD
有錯請指教。
7. 他會將大任攬在年輕新兵身上,還是傾向交給資深球員?
Will he trust young players in big spots, or is he more inclined to
use his veterans?
He trusts young players more than any other coach, perhaps. He started
rookies Harrison Barnes and Festus Ezeli last season. Draymond Green, whom
Jackson effusively praises, received a lot more playing time than your
typical second-round rookie. So long as the young player is practicing well,
he’s afforded the larger stage.
他比任何教練都更相信新兵,或許啦。他上一季讓菜鳥Harrison Barnes和Festus Ezeli
扛了先發,他大力讚賞的Draymond Green,也比任何第二輪菜鳥得到了更多的上場時間。
而既然這些年輕球員都能夠起到很好的作用,他也願意給他們更多的發揮機會。
8. 他相信進階數據那套嗎?
Is he an advanced stats guy?
Yes, but reputedly by accident. Jackson won’t admit to letting analytics
dictate his actions, but his actions often agree with the stats. He likes
leaving players in the game after they’ve incurred foul “trouble.” He
likes when his players fire up 3-pointers immediately off offensive rebounds.
He sometimes lets his team run the final play without a timeout to guide
them. If Jackson comes about these sound decisions by accident, it may be
because bad coaching decisions skew fearful, and Jackson isn’t a fearful
coach.
相信,但不過聽說是場意外。他不會讓那些分析去指導他的執教,但是他的作為卻往往
跟數據所指出的不謀而合。他不會因球員惹上犯規麻煩就他們換下來,他喜歡讓球員在
搶到進攻籃板後馬上來噴個三分(譯按: 是因為往往搶到進攻籃板時對方防守往往已經
亂開所以很容易有空檔嗎?)他有時候也會在最後一波進攻時不喊暫停,讓球員自己發
揮。如果說他這些作為都只是巧合,那應該是因為壞的執教會懼怕而畏縮,而Jackson
並不是個有所畏懼的教練。
9. 他有什麼特別喜愛的獨特策略嗎?
Are there any unique strategies that he particularly likes?
The Warriors run a lot of floppy action (two guards crisscrossing under the
basket, off the ball) to get into their sets. Jackson ran this as an Indiana
point guard and he’s made good use of it in Oakland. Curry and Thompson race
through the kinds of staggered screens the Pacers once deployed to spring
Reggie Miller, whom Jackson remains close friends with.
Golden State has adopted an action called “the split game” where they often
force defenses to make a quick decision between guarding a cutting Iguodala
or guarding Curry as he pops out for a 3-pointer. They also love to free
Curry for semi transition 3-pointers with screens above the arc. The most
eye-catching Warriors play is “Elevator Doors,” where Curry or Thompson
race between two Warriors bigs as they converge to create a massive two-man
screen.
Golden State’s execution is more unusual than the particular play calls they
use. It’s upside-down world, where big men can push fast breaks and shooting
guards regularly punish defenders in the post. The latter strategy is
designed to hurt teams that guard Curry with someone other than their
smallest player.
勇士隊跑了很多floppy action(兩名後衛同時無球繞底)然後開始戰術。Jackson 在
溜馬打球時就很常使用這招,在奧克蘭(勇士主場)時也做了很好的運用。Curry 和
Thompson在這種交叉的掩護下有所發揮,而這也是溜馬當初設計給Reggie Miller--
Jackson至今的好友--的戰術。
勇士也很常來一套他們稱為"the split game"的招數,這迫使防守要在防守空切的小AI
以及防止Curry噴你一臉三分之間做出決定。他們也很喜歡讓Curry在攻守轉換時透過一
個簡單的掩護就在弧頂三分出手。而勇士最令人矚目的戰術莫非就是電梯門要關惹這招,
也就是Curry 或Thompson會在兩名大個的掩護中間穿出來進行攻擊。
勇士的戰術執行比他們紙面上設計的那些戰術還要不尋常一些,這是個反過來的世界,
他們的大漢們可以衝快攻、而他們的小後衛卻常能在低位虐虐防守者。後面這招是拿來
對付那些比Curry 還矮的防守者的。
影片: floppy action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPKFM9WFBW0
雖然是馬刺的影片啦,注意鬼禿把球給出去之後兩名沉底的後衛就各自繞底,好處在
於這很容易在防守交代不清的情況下造成錯位跟空檔。
影片: 電梯門
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUS4vUh4M6I
10. 他當個球員時是什麼樣子?
What were his characteristics as a player?
Jackson’s stocky frame did not belong in the NBA. He excelled due to vision,
guile and a bruising post game. Though a pious man, he would wildly celebrate
his successes. Jackson’s celebration of choice was the loose shimmy, which
you’ll occasionally see Curry break out as an homage.
Jackson 矮壯的身材在NBA是極為少見的,他的視野、奸巧(會不會被桶)跟低位技巧讓
他擠身卓越。雖然他是個虔誠的人,但他在有所好表現時卻是會大肆慶祝的。他很喜歡
的一招是loose shimmy,你會很常看到Curry 用這個動作向教練致敬。
影片:loose shimmy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk6F_2yMxro
11. 他為哪些教練打過球?
Which coaches did he play for?
Rick Pitino, Pat Riley, Larry Brown, Larry Bird, and Jeff Van Gundy are the
heavy hitters. He also had an ill-fated stint under Jerry Sloan that ended
amid a lot of speculation over whether Jackson turned the team against John
Stockton.
Rick Pitino、Pat Riley、Larry Brown、Larry Bird以及 Jeff Van Gundy都是他曾為
其貢獻的大腕教練。他在Jerry Sloan 底下也有場不太愉快的經歷,最後在他企圖離間
隊友與老史的風聲中結束。
12. 他的執教師承自誰?
What is his coaching pedigree?
Nothing, nothing at all.
完全沒有畫面,報告完全沒有畫面。
13. 如果沒有籃球的話,他現在會在做什麼?
If basketball didn't exist, what might he be doing?
He’s already an ordained pastor. Should Jackson leave coaching in the near
future, expect him to mix that with his old announcing job.
他已經是名具資格的牧師了,如果他哪天離開執教這個工作的話,可以期待他把這個專
長跟他之前球評的工作來個融合。
英文原文: http://tinyurl.com/kdy7czt
作者: ThisIsNotKFC (Time to Change)   2013-11-23 23:47:00
推翻譯

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com