如題，前面也有板友提出疑問
的確是犯規的
http://gamedayr.com/gamedayr/tim-duncan-game-6-illegal-substitution/
The NBA dodged a massive bullet after Ray Allen pulled a Jesus Shuttlesworth
and saved the Heat’s season with 5.3 seconds remaining in regulation of Game
6. Had future Hall of Famer Tim Duncan been the one to bury a game-winner in
those final seconds, the league would have to explain why a player who was
not even supposed to be in the game in the first place had just won his Spurs
the championship.
Ray Allen在正規賽剩下5.3秒時扮演救世主射進了一個三分球並解救了熱火隊...
這也讓NBA逃過了一個大麻煩
要是Duncan最後又投進絕殺球，聯盟大概就得準備解釋:
為什麼一個根本不應該在場上的球員可以幫馬刺贏得勝利?
Let’s back up. What are we talking about?
?
??
現在到底是在講啥?
After Allen hit his series and season-saving three for Miami, the officials
stopped the game in order to check out the tape. The refs were looking to
make sure Allen’s feet were both behind the three-point line.
當Allen投進了關鍵的三分後 裁判暫停了比賽去看重播以確認Allen的腳
沒有踩線.
Coach Gregg Popovich’s Spurs were out of timeouts at the time. The break in
action gave him an opportunity to at least talk to his players, if not draw
something up.
Popovich其實已經沒有暫停了...這個空檔剛好可以讓他跟他的球員談談
Pop substituted Duncan, which was an illegal move. Because there was no foul
or timeout called, the same five players that walked off the court to wait
were the same five who were supposed to walk back on.
但是Pop把Duncan換上去是不行的啊!!!! 因為沒有犯規或是暫停的發生，
走下場的五名球員一定要和回到場上的五名球員一樣， 一個都不能改
But such was not the case, and the NBA confirmed its mistake on Wednesday.
不過這種事情就是發生了，NBA今天也承認了他們的失誤
Nuts, indeed. The substitution should have been called a technical foul,
which should have resulted in Miami foul shots. Such a situation would have
presumably resulted in Ray Allen winning the game for the Heat.
真的很囧。當時這個換人應該要判馬刺一個T的(Duncan for T!!!!!!!!!!)
熱火要罰一球....
而這很有可能讓熱火直接帶走勝利....Ray Allen變成讓熱火直接獲勝的大功臣
Conversely, if Duncan (or any other Spurs player for that matter) had hit a
shot to win the game, they would have done all the celebrating in the world —
only to have to re-play the final five seconds of the game at a later date.
反過來說 要是Duncan(或馬刺任何人)
投進任何一球「贏得勝利」，他們和各地的球迷大概已經瘋狂的在慶祝勝利....
不過當這個違規被發現之後，他們事後還是得回來重打G6最後五秒鐘-_-
Seriously. The shot would have been protested by the Heat, and an expedited
ruling on the part of commissioner David Stern would have likely forced the
two teams to take the court, totally cold, with seconds remaining in Game 6
of the Finals. Remember, the Spurs would have already celebrated winning the
NBA title, as any game-winning shot with Duncan on the floor at that point
would have given San Antonio four wins for the series.
我是認真的，就算馬刺慶祝都慶祝完了，熱火還是可能提出抗議，
Stern很可能命令兩隊回去重打G6的最後關頭....
(這真的蠻有可能發生的..任何馬刺球員進球都可能為馬刺贏得總冠軍)
Luckily, the NBA does not have to worry about any of the this. The Spurs did
not score, the Heat won, 103-100, in an epic overtime clash, and now both are
gearing up for what promises to be a Game 7 for the ages.
算是幸運吧，NBA不需要為這煩惱了,因為熱火最後贏了
Although we just have to say: While the Thursday Game 7 is going to be nuts,
doing over Game 6 would have really made for some viewing for the ages.
不管G7打的怎樣，G6就算在很久以後也是會被拿出來檢視的案例了