https://tinyurl.com/ya8e2hyc
MLB has been concerned that the players association has misrepresented the
March 26 agreement to the players by dismissing language that called for new
conversations about economic feasibility if games return without paying
spectators and stating that the issue was settled with a management promise
of prorated salary in the same document.
MLB擔心從近期報導 工會可能沒正確把三月協定的內容傳達給球員
To that end, Halem told The Post in a text, “The one piece of good news out
of [Sunday’s] meeting is that Tony Clark acknowledged that the March
Agreement contemplated another negotiation over player salaries if the 2020
season could not be played in front of fans. We were concerned based on media
reports if players knew that. Tony told us the players were aware that the
March Agreement did not resolve the issue of player salaries in a season
without fans. And he said the players‘ decision to accept nothing less than
100 percent of their prorated salaries was due to the risks of playing the
season, not because they were promised it in the March 26 agreement.”
但在協商中Clark表示三月協定確實規定在無觀眾比賽時 薪資須重新協商
球員並不是以為三月協定就決定一切
堅持按比例支薪是基於風險考量