※ [本文轉錄自 NY-Yankees 看板 #1Qo48xts ]
作者: rt3648yth (Archipelago群島) 看板: NY-Yankees
標題: [討論] Didi衝本壘out
時間: Sat Apr 7 11:59:49 2018
剛剛Didi的play相信大家都看過了，然後裁判的判決讓多數版友(包含我)很不爽，所以呢，
小弟我剛剛去看了一下棒球規則7-13，先上原文內容：
OFFICIAL BASEBALL RULE 7.13 Collisions at home plate
A runner attempting to score may not deviate from his direct pathway to the
plate in order to initiate contact with the catcher (or other player covering
home plate). If, in the judgment of the umpire, a runner attempting to score
initiates contact with the catcher (or other player covering home plate) in
such a manner, the umpire shall declare the runner out (even if the player
covering home plate loses possession of the ball). In such circumstances, the
umpire shall call the ball dead, and all other baserunners shall return to
the last base touched at the time of the collision.
Rule 7.13 comment: The failure by the runner to make an effort to touch the
plate, the runner's lowering of the shoulder, or the runner's pushing through
with his hands, elbows or arms, would support a determination that the runner
deviated from the pathway in order to initiate contact with the catcher in
violation of Rule 7.13. If the runner slides into the plate in an appropriate
manner, he shall not be adjudged to have violated Rule 7.13. A slide shall be
deemed appropriate, in the case of a feet first slide, if the runner's
buttocks and legs should hit the ground before contact with the catcher. In
the case of a head first slide, a runner shall be deemed to have slid
appropriately if his body should hit the ground before contact with the
catcher.
Unless the catcher is in possession of the ball, the catcher cannot block the
pathway of the runner as he is attempting to score. If, in the judgment of
the umpire, the catcher without possession of the ball blocks the pathway of
the runner, the umpire shall call or signal the runner safe. Notwithstanding
the above, it shall not be considered a violation of this Rule 7.13 if the
catcher blocks the pathway of the runner in order to field a throw, and the
umpire determines that the catcher could not have fielded the ball without
blocking the pathway of the runner and that contact with the runner was
unavoidable.
可以注意到最後一段，裡面只說到Catcher，但是沒有說到補位的防守者，所以剛剛Givens
雖然有妨礙跑壘的嫌疑，但裁判無法用此條款來判他妨礙因此最後維持原判。
其他版友有甚麼想法呢? 歡迎在下面推文討論
參考資料：https://goo.gl/TdhNDf
對了，補個道歉啟事，wen大大，剛剛在live文下面我太衝動了，導致我發表一些激烈噓
文，
冷靜過後在此跟你說聲抱歉orz。