推 externaload:簽他去守粉味公園LF 注定守備價值就是要被綠色怪物吃 06/11 17:43
→ externaload:光光 打擊再打不出來.....真的杯具 06/11 17:43
不過說起球場對防守的影響 這裡有個很有趣的計算
http://tinyurl.com/7ghsftu
If I take all the slow players and subtract each player’s difference between
small and large parks (ignoring average ones), weighted by the minimum of the
chances in each matched pair, I get -4.7. That is small minus large park.
So that means that the slow players GAIN 4.7 runs per 150 when “going”
from a small to a large park.
For the fast players, it is +.6 runs, which means that they LOSE .6 runs when
going from a small to a large park. So, as I said, the slower players do a
lot better than the faster players in a large park relative to a slow one,
exactly the opposite of CW and perhaps intuition. The difference is over 5
runs per 150.
快腿從大球場到小球場 防守可以加0.6分
而慢腿從小球場到大球場 防守可以加4.7分
這...有人信嗎?
是說參考紅襪另一位快腿Jacoby Ellsbury在LF防守數據明顯勝過CF (LF遠勝平均)
我覺得所謂綠色怪物吃球的說法可能被大家高估許多了