不介意的話 就讓我佔板面提一下延長賽那題的翻譯
Extra innings - Do the Phillies have enough offensive firepower?
延長賽-費城人有足夠的攻擊火力嗎?
It's a popular question, but one that I think gets asked only because of the
bash and mash offenses the Phillies put together in the late aughts.
這是個熱門問題 但(依費城人現況而言)會被問是因為前幾年的進攻火力太猛了
要注意的是這裡:in the late aughts.
aughts是特指 每世紀的頭一個十年 也就是說他指的不是去年 而是00~09中的後幾年
稍微查了一下 06~09總得分都遠比11年高得多 也比10年高
原作者的意思是說: 現在的費城人根本沒有火力問題
會有人問只是因為之前火力真的太妖獸 (相對來看現在好像很弱)
而bash and mash就是很單純形容進攻威猛的詞
Last season, the Phillies scored 713 runs and allowed 529. That equates to an
average offense and an elite defense. Looking player by player, I see no
reason why the Phillies won't once again be an average offensive team, which
puts the onus on the pitching staff and defense to repeat historic
performance. Which is the better question: Can the offense once again be
average, or can the rotation post another historic season?
上個球季費城人得了713分失了529分 代表的是平均的攻擊與精強的防禦
看著球員名單我完全找不到費城人進攻面打不出平均以上的可能
也就代表要打出跟上季一樣的戰績 需要的是防守面繼續史詩級威猛
所以加分題應該這樣問:攻擊能維持平均水準嗎? 還是輪值能再史詩一次呢?
In 2010, the Giants scored 697 runs and allowed 581. You might recall they
bashed their way through the Phillies on the way to the World Series. The
Phillies are looking to use that same formula.
上上季的老人只打進697分 卻也只掉了581分
大家應該記得那年NLDS費城人是怎樣被老人輾過的
今年的費城人將試著複製這個策略~
應該是這樣吧 參考看看~