FG上的新文章
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/angels-sign-albert-pujols/
It’s simply going to be cost prohibitive to retain all or even most of those
guys, so the Angels have likely chosen Pujols over retaining their in-house
players who will be up for big raises in the not too distant future. I don’t
know that spending $25 million per year on Pujols is actually going to
provide a better return than using that money to lock up some combination of
Aybar, Kendrick, and Haren, and if the Angels have to let several of those
players go to keep their payrolls at reasonable levels, it’s not clear that
they’ve actually improved their ability to contend during the time when
Pujols still projects as an elite player.
簽普神 vs 留下合約快到期的自家球員
大家覺得哪一個才是比較好的花錢方式?