Re: [問題] 歐姆破壞者為什麼不重做或刪除?

作者: fkc (Mr. 男子漢)   2017-06-15 19:04:23
兩個月之前的帖子就翻過了
這裝備在季中改版,重新整理坦裝的時候,就有講到了
Follow-up to early Midseason Durability feedback
https://goo.gl/cWMlIN
Why didn't we work on Thornmail/Ohmwrecker/Banner/Zz'Rot/etc.?
(為啥沒有動荊棘甲/歐姆破壞者/指揮旗幟/虛空之門?)
While working on all these items, one of the top goals was to lay a good
foundation for defensive itemization that could be built upon. There are
definitely some items in the shop that are hardly earning their place, but we
think those items can hopefully be tackled one at a time in individual
patches down the road. For what it's worth, we even had some iterations of
Ohmwrecker where it was positioned to have a statline more like
Sunfire/DMP/Randuin's, but playtests showed that without significant work on
the item active, it still would never be attractive unless just grossly
overtuned. And thus we focused on getting the frameworks in a good spot, and
coming back to individual items like these later.
長話短說就是
R 社相信有一天,這些沒有改動的裝備(效果)會有出人頭地的時候;所以保留。
而關於歐姆破壞者,曾嘗試將它的數值修改類似日炎/死肩/蘭頓。
但內部測試時,它的主動效果 ─ 對於玩家而言 ─ 依舊缺乏吸引力
意味著歐姆就算改數值,還是不會有人要買
所以 R 社先回頭進行季中改版的內容,暫時擱置這裝備。
歐姆破壞者,目前狀態 : 閒置。
-End
比起歐姆蛋,荷包蛋半熟淋一點醬油,才是蛋的真理
醬油派站出來吧! ヽ( ゚ ∀ 。)ノ 擺出《前進高棉》的姿勢!
作者: ryanchen1234 (guava)   2017-06-15 19:47:00
你根本就是為了衝人氣在備註討論食物吧
作者: blackcat1129 (MaYA)   2017-06-15 20:48:00
_ 歐姆蛋才是正義
作者: PLEASE974853 (PLEASE974853)   2017-06-15 20:53:00
原味派路過

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com