http://ppt.cc/BfiO
A Thought Experiment to Wake People Up to Why the Argument for Jeremy Lin
being Needed with 2nd Unit is Disturbing
一個思想上的實驗 : 解除 認為林需要在替補陣容的人們的洗腦 是會使人爆怒的
Those well-meaning people who argue that Lin is needed with the second
unit generally present an argument that goes something like this.
那些認為林需要在替補的"好心"人通常會提出以下觀點
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Lin is needed with the second unit, because right now, they don’t have enough
guys who can score in the second unit–especially with Nick Young out.
林需要打替補，因為現在湖人的替補陣容沒有足夠的人可以得分，尤其是尼克楊掛掉了。
So they need Lin to run the show there and be the primary scorer. Additionally,
Ronnie Price is not up to the task of bearing the brunt of the scoring or play making role,
so allowing Ronnie Price to run the second unit would be disastrous.
所以湖人需要林在替補陣容中擔任控場角色並且做為進攻箭頭。此外，因為普萊斯控場
能力不夠而且也不能當進攻箭頭，讓普萊斯運轉替補陣容會變成大災難。
Having Lin run the second unit is not saying that Price is better than Lin.
In fact, it is saying that Lin is better than Price and that’s why
Lin is NEEDED to run the second unit. We need the better point guard to run
the second unit. Also, Lin has chemistry with Davis, so he needs to be in the
second unit to run PnRs with Davis. Kobe Bryant can take care of things with
the first unit, and besides, Kobe is a ball-dominant guard, so it makes more
sense for Lin to be with the second unit.
讓林運轉替補陣容不是說普萊斯比林更好。事實上因是因為林比普萊斯更好才需要林來
運轉替補陣容。我們需要更好的PG來運轉替補陣容。而且林跟戴維斯很來電，所以林需要
在替補陣容中跟戴維斯打擋拆。老大能顧好先發陣容需要擔心的事情，此外老大是需要
持球的後衛，所以把林放在替補陣容更好。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Sounds logical enough, right?
聽起來很有邏輯，對唄？
Well, what if, instead of Jeremy Lin, the Lakers have someone like Dragic
(or insert ANY PG not named “Jeremy Lin” that’s better than Price)
as the Point Guard. Do you think there would be ANY discussion about
whether or not Dragic should start?
吶，如果說不是林，湖人有另一個像是抓雞（或是其他不是叫做林但是比普萊斯好的PG）
之類的PG，你認為還有任何抓雞是否該先發的爭論呢？
Of course there wouldn’t. And you know why? Well, because Dragic is a
starting point guard, of course. It’s obvious! Dragic doesn’t belong with
the second unit.
當然這不可能了唄？那你知道為什麼嗎？因為抓雞是個先發PG，很明顯不是嗎？抓雞
不可能打替補啊！
Are you out of your mind?!
因此，http://i.imgur.com/8DtoIRh.jpg
So how come with Dragic on the team instead of Lin, the Lakers’s second unit
suddenly don’t need any help?
所以如果湖人現在擁有抓雞而不是林，湖人的替補陣容突然就不需要任何幫助了吼！？
Suddenly, Price is more than capable of running the second unit? Isn’t Dragic
better than Price?
突然間，普萊斯變成有能力控制替補陣容了逆？不是說抓雞比普萊斯好嗎？
I thought we wanted the better point guard to run the second unit,
since the second unit needs SO much help. At least that was the case when
it was Lin on the team, instead of Dragic.
我認為我們需要更好的PG在替補陣容內控場，因為替補陣容需要更多幫助。至少那是因為
林在湖人裡，而不是抓雞。
So how come it’s no longer the case now? And don’t we need Dragic to
be with Davis so he can run PnRs with Davis? Also, suddenly with Dragic on
the team, Kobe is no longer a ball-dominant guard?
那汝說為什麼這突然都不是理由了吶？而且我們不是需要抓雞跟戴維斯打擋拆嗎？而且
當抓雞在隊伍裡的時候，老大就變成不需要一球在手的後衛了唷？
I don’t understand how well-meaning people don’t see how disturbing the
argument for why Lin is needed with the second unit is. The argument itself
is not logical. And that’s the problem I have with it.
我不了解那些"好心"人沒看見林需要打替補這爭論是令人困擾的。這爭論一點邏輯都沒有
。這就是我困惑的理由。
If people were to make a logical argument, then it would go something like
this:
如果人們要邏輯的來論證一下就會變成下面這個樣子唄
Lin > Price = Lin is needed with Second Unit ==> Lin doesn’t start
林比普萊斯好＝林需要打替補＝林不先發
Dragic > Price = Dragic is needed with Second Unit ==> Dragic doesn’t start
抓雞比普萊斯好＝抓雞需要打替補＝抓雞不先發
This pair of logic language matches so it makes sense. But, instead, this is
the argument people would make:
這兩個等式應該要相呼應才會合理。不過相反的爭論人們總是會......
Lin > Price = Lin is needed with Second Unit ==> Lin doesn’t start
林比普萊斯好＝林需要打替補＝林不先發
Dragic > Price = Dragic is needed with Second Unit ==> Dragic starts
抓雞比普萊斯好＝抓雞需要打替補＝抓雞先發
Any eight year old could see that this pair of logic does not match up and
this is why it’s so vexing to me why people don’t see how disturbing their
logic is for why Lin is needed with the second unit.
任何八歲小孩都可以看到這邏輯狗屁不通。這就是為啥我對於人們為啥還不醒悟如此火大