: 熾炎戰斧
:
: 我們曾考量把熾炎戰斧的攻擊力降至 2 點。這看起來相當單純，不過尚未習慣此更動的
: 玩家可能會下意識地攻擊 3 點生命的手下，然後驚覺自己並未解決掉目標。提升法力水
: 晶消費不但可以避免這種狀況發生，也達到兼顧平衡性的訴求。
因為這段說明實在是太幽默了，想說是不是BB自己寫的就去查了原文
結果發現差有點多R：
The other option we considered for Fiery War Axe was to lower its attack to
2, but that change didn’t feel intuitive enough. Generally, changing the
mana cost of a card is less disruptive, because you can always see the mana
cost of cards in your hand. Despite the increased mana cost of Fiery War Axe,
we expect that it will still see play—other 3 mana 3/2 weapons, like
Eaglehorn Bow, can be found in decks that may not have synergy with the weapon
’s card text.
https://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/blog/21029448/
大概意思是改2攻不夠直觀 基本上改消耗對玩家的干擾比較少
因為你總是可以看到手牌消耗的水晶
儘管小斧變三費 但我們覺得應該還是會有人用
像其他3/3/2 好比鷹角弓 即使沒跟秘密搭 也會被放進牌組中
.... 有沒有幹話型翻譯的八卦？