別教壞小孩
現今學術論文對抄襲 plagiarism 的認定比你想像的嚴格得多
例如我剛剛 google 到某校(應該不是學店)，對 plagiarism 的定義
以下節錄自 https://www.lse.ac.uk/health-policy/current-students/plagiarism
``
... inserting a section of text (of any size) from someone else's work in to
your own without quotation marks would be plagiarism even if the source were
acknowledged in a precise reference. ...
For example, this is plagiarism:
In my essay, I will be analysing the rise of NGOs. Since the 1980s, NGOs have
moved to the forefront of development policy and practice. There are many
different types of NGOs, as I will show in the next section…
This is not (because it is properly quoted):
In my essay, I will be analysing the rise of NGOs. As Smith has written
(1998:17) "since the 1980s, NGOs have moved to the forefront of development
policy and practice". There are many different types of NGOs, as I will show
in the next section…
''
當然啦，時空背景不同，不能要求每個世代每個學校畢業生對於抄襲都有一樣的理解
我只想說：總統女士有練過，好孩子不要學
※ 引述《kcbill (明日やろうは馬鹿野郎だ)》之銘言：
: 安安好像剛剛論文仔又高潮了一波
: 根據林環牆教授臉書貼文
: 發現說蔡英文博士論文抄襲兩段
: 是抄襲貿易理論學者Harry G. Johnson
: 其實林環牆用紅框標起來的是第14頁兩句話
: 1.
: whether a country is absolutely strong or absolutely weak, it can maximize the
: power avialable to it by concentrating on those activities in which it is rel
: atively more powerful and hiring the services of specialists in those activiti
: es in which it is weaker.
: 2.
: Both the Ricardian and the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson models carry the implicit
: assumption that involvement in international trade entails the enjoyment of e
: conomic benefits from efficient resource utilization with little or no cost in
: terms of serious disturbance to men’s livehood and economic and social lives
: .
: https://i.imgur.com/MKvM0j0.jpg
: 不過林環牆沒有貼出來的是下一頁第15頁
: https://i.imgur.com/3QclpAI.jpg
: 很明顯的可以發現蔡英文在那邊有註記
: 然後我們往註記頁那邊翻
: https://i.imgur.com/t4iXZo1.jpg
: 就可以發現出處是Johnson在某本書的前言
: H.G. Johnson, Forewords to the ‘Trade Effects of Public Subsidies to Private
: Enterprises’ by G. Denton, S. O’Cleireacan and S. Ash, pp. xxv
: （林環牆說的抄襲Johnson就是這邊這位）
: 林環牆質疑抄襲的的第二句話
: 在蔡英文有註記的這個出處的第xxv頁
: https://i.imgur.com/XmfqW3o.jpg
: 而林環牆質疑的第一句話
: 同樣在這個出處找得到在第xix頁
: https://i.imgur.com/L1lNNge.jpg
: 論文仔最多也只能打林環牆質疑的第一句話蔡英文沒有緊接著明確標註而已
: （但其實那一段基本上就是簡述什麼叫做比較優勢理論而已）
: 簡單google一下配合翻蔡英文論文的下一頁和註記頁就可以知道結果，論文仔可以高潮真
: 的是www
: 有人要轉去八卦回原本爆卦那篇文嗎XD