※ 引述《GAYhivAIDS (刀劍亂舞)》之銘言：
: https://bit.ly/34zQgb8
: 歐盟藥品管理局EMA
: 旗下的藥物風險評估委員會PRAC
: 正在調查施打輝瑞及莫德納後
: 出現大量月經或月經沒來的現象
: 之前的報告是找不到因果關係
: 不過PRAC還是進一步調查
: 目前無證據顯示Covid疫苗會影響生育能力
: 哇這個....
: 根據Dr Malone 的說法 疫苗公司關於是否會影響生育的研究報告這次都沒照常規去做
: 其實mRNA技術的發明者 去年早就出來說新技術對大眾健康產生長期的潛在威脅
: 結果被政府打成失智學者
: 另外照Dr Malone專訪(1:27:00左右)
: 有提到根據一些實驗可能原因是原本要留在手臂肌肉的載子亂跑到骨髓或卵巢
: 跑去卵巢的就造成月經不正常(大意是這樣 但我不是專業也不是很懂)
月經是很容易受到短期影響的喔
壓力會不會影響月經？
生病是不是一種壓力？
疫苗模擬感染，誘發免疫反應是不是一種壓力？
壓力還有分生理與心理的
不同人對接種的壓力不同、免疫反應強弱不同
不同人有相同壓力時對月經的影響也不同
因此，很難證實關聯，因為變數太多
當然，spike也有"可能"喔，但即便還未證實spike對月經的影響，前述的情況就足以影響
月經了
The HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine and the flu vaccine have been reported
to affect menstrual cycles temporarily
HPV疫苗跟流感疫苗也有被報導過短暫影響月經週期
"Menstrual changes are very common, and even before vaccination, almost four o
ut of ten young women reported that they had experienced such changes.
挪威的報導，月經發生變化非常常見，即便在接種疫苗前也有4/10女性經歷過月經變化
Many women reported heavier periods than normal after the first and second vac
cine dose:
7.6 per cent reported heavier periods before vaccination
13.6 per cent reported heavier periods after the first dose
8.2 per cent reported heavier periods before the second dose
15.3 per cent reported heavier periods after the second dose
接種前，7~8%
接種後，13~15%
"Most menstrual changes after the first dose were transient. On average, they
returned to their normal levels by the time of vaccination with the second dos
e, approximately two to three months after the first dose.
大多數的經期改變是短暫的，約2~3個月
補充一下，挪威研究自己聲明的侷限性
Limitations?
The responses in the study are based on self-reported data. It is conceivable
that women who experienced menstrual changes after the first dose were concern
ed and thus more likely to report this also after the second dose, compared wi
th women who did not experience menstrual disorders after the first dose. Ther
e has been a lot of media attention around the signals that have come after co
ronavirus vaccination, which may have also氲ontributed濳o more women reporting
menstrual changes after vaccination, even if they have previously experienced
similar episodes without vaccination.?
1.自我報告
2.第一次發生的女性會"更加"注意第二次是否發生(造成偏差)
3.報導推波助瀾下，更多女性在接種後會特別注意是否發生改變，即使他之前可能也就曾
發生改變只是沒有去注意(造成偏差)
We included 3,959 individuals (vaccinated 2,403; unvaccinated 1,556). Most of
the vaccinated cohort received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (55%) (Moderna 35%,
Johnson & Johnson/Janssen 7%). Overall, COVID-19 vaccine was associated with
a less than 1-day change in cycle length for both vaccine-dose cycles compared
with prevaccine cycles (first dose 0.71 day-increase, 98.75% CI 0.47–0.94; s
econd dose 0.91, 98.75% CI 0.63–1.19); unvaccinated individuals saw no signif
icant change compared with three baseline cycles (cycle four 0.07, 98.75% CI
0.22 to 0.35; cycle five 0.12, 98.75% CI 0.15 to 0.39). In adjusted models
, the difference in change in cycle length between the vaccinated and unvaccin
ated cohorts was less than 1 day for both doses (difference in change: first d
ose 0.64 days, 98.75% CI 0.27–1.01; second dose 0.79 days, 98.75% CI 0.40–1.
18). Change in menses length was not associated with vaccination.
美國研究，3959人，2403接種疫苗、1556未接種
接種的月經週期減少"小於一天"，未接種無減少
月經長度無差異
月經週期差不到一天，就是30天(舉例)來變成29天來...
英國有個1273人的研究是沒差異
月經改變太可怕了，一定是卵巢被攻擊了(笑)