※ 引述《Borges (波波波波)》之銘言：
: https://tinyurl.com/39f8x7v7
: 比較有趣的是
: 16.The LSE accepted that it did still retain President Tsai’s student record,
: but that that record only dealt with her activities at the LSE – and this
: did not include details of her final examination or viva.
: LSE同意仍保有蔡英文的學生紀錄，但裡面僅記載了她在LSE的活動，沒有任何
: 博士論文口試細節
: 17. The student record had been examined and no definitive record of the
: examiners had been found. Whilst one document indicated that a
: particular individual might have been an examiner, the LSE had no way
: of cross-checking whether that individual had in fact performed that role
: – and the LSE considered it unlikely that they would have done so.
: 學生紀錄表裡沒有明確的口試委員紀錄
: 有一個可能的人名出現-但LSE認為他們無法交叉核實
: 18.The LSE was satisfied that no relevant information had been destroyed
: and that the reason that it did not hold the information now was that it
: had never held the information – because the information was held by
: the University of London. It had been able to confirm the authenticity of
: the degree based on the copy of the notification it had received from the
: University of London, in 1984, confirming that President Tsai had been
: awarded a PhD.
: LSE認為沒有任何相關信息是被銷毀的
: 唯一沒有這些紀錄的原因是LSE從未有過這些紀錄
: 紀錄在倫敦大學
: 1984年有一份倫敦大學的通知copy說蔡英文有獲得學位
: 對照非常有名的LSE官網聲明
: https://tinyurl.com/2jchufzj
: We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London - the
: degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was correctly awarded
: a PhD in Law in 1984.
: 我們在LSE和倫敦大學有清楚的紀錄證明蔡英文博士在1984年有正確獲得法學博士學位
: 嗯....至少聲明裡的LSE應該直接刪掉吧....
LSE有學生活動細節。
倫敦大學有口試資料。
兩邊加起來才是完整的資料
所以不能刪啊
有沒有看過KANO啊？
順道一提倫敦大學的相關法院判決上個月就已經上架了
下載連結
https://bit.ly/30kh39n
直接講重點
http://i.imgur.com/ty0RxHG.jpg
法官確認了倫敦大學的確持有口試資料
期待Richardson拿著ICO確認LSE沒有口試資料的的判決向First tier Tribunal Court上訴喔
: 【延伸閱讀】
: 蔡總統談自己的博士論文口試
: https://tinyurl.com/2p8jkjb5
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDEisWkTUk