https://tinyurl.com/39f8x7v7
比較有趣的是
16.The LSE accepted that it did still retain President Tsai’s student record,
but that that record only dealt with her activities at the LSE – and this
did not include details of her final examination or viva.
LSE同意仍保有蔡英文的學生紀錄，但裡面僅記載了她在LSE的活動，沒有任何
博士論文口試細節
17. The student record had been examined and no definitive record of the
examiners had been found. Whilst one document indicated that a
particular individual might have been an examiner, the LSE had no way
of cross-checking whether that individual had in fact performed that role
– and the LSE considered it unlikely that they would have done so.
學生紀錄表裡沒有明確的口試委員紀錄
有一個可能的人名出現-但LSE認為他們無法交叉核實
18.The LSE was satisfied that no relevant information had been destroyed
and that the reason that it did not hold the information now was that it
had never held the information – because the information was held by
the University of London. It had been able to confirm the authenticity of
the degree based on the copy of the notification it had received from the
University of London, in 1984, confirming that President Tsai had been
awarded a PhD.
LSE認為沒有任何相關信息是被銷毀的
唯一沒有這些紀錄的原因是LSE從未有過這些紀錄
紀錄在倫敦大學
1984年有一份倫敦大學的通知copy說蔡英文有獲得學位
對照非常有名的LSE官網聲明
https://tinyurl.com/2jchufzj
We can be clear the records of LSE and of the University of London - the
degree awarding body at the time - confirm that Dr Tsai was correctly awarded
a PhD in Law in 1984.
我們在LSE和倫敦大學有清楚的紀錄證明蔡英文博士在1984年有正確獲得法學博士學位
嗯....至少聲明裡的LSE應該直接刪掉吧....
【延伸閱讀】
蔡總統談自己的博士論文口試
https://tinyurl.com/2p8jkjb5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDEisWkTUk