※ 引述《franz10123 (koenig7)》之銘言：
: https://zenodo.org/record/4028830
:
: 連登已經熱烈討論中了，台灣這邊似乎還沒什麼人注意，據說剛剛發布網站就被DDoS中
: 無重大八卦請勿使用此分類，否則視同濫用爆卦鬧板(文章退回、水桶6個月)
: 未滿30繁體中文字 水桶3個月
至少也翻譯一下摘要吧？
由新型冠狀病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的COVID-19大流行已在全球造成91萬人死亡，對全球
經濟造成前所未有的嚴重破壞。儘管具有巨大的影響，SARS-CoV-2的起源仍然是神祕的和
有爭議的。自然起源理論雖然被廣泛接受，但缺乏實質性的支持。然而，另一種認爲病毒
可能來自研究實驗室的理論受到同儕評審的科學期刊的嚴格審查。儘管如此，SARS-CoV-2
顯示了與自然發生的人畜共患病毒不一致的生物學特性。在這份報告中，我們描述了基因
組，結構，醫學和文獻證據，當一起考慮時，強烈地反對自然起源理論。證據表明，
SARS-CoV-2應該是使用蝙蝠冠狀病毒ZC45和/或ZXC21作爲模板和/或主幹的實驗室產物。
基於這些證據，我們進一步假設了SARS-CoV-2的合成途徑，證明了在實驗室中製造這種冠
狀病毒是方便的，可以在大約6個月內完成。我們的工作強調了對相關研究實驗室進行獨
立調查的必要性。它還主張對最近發表的某些數據進行批判性調查，這些數據雖然有問題
，但被用來支持和聲稱SARS-CoV-2的天然來源。從公共衛生的角度來看，這些行動是必要
的，因爲了解SARS-CoV-2的起源以及病毒如何進入人類群體，對於從根本上控制COVID-19
大流行以及預防今後類似的大流行至關重要。
摘要在下面，翻譯在上面：
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to
over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global
economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained
mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely
accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus
may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on
peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological
characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic
virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and
literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts
the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a
laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a
template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a
synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of
this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six
months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into
the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into
certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to
support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health
perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of
SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal
importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in
preventing similar, future pandemics.