※ 引述《dannyzzz (dannyzzz)》之銘言：
: 突破高雄發展盲點不容緩！韓國瑜密會城市設計大師。（圖/翻攝自中天新聞YouTube）
: https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181231000611-260407
:
抱歉幾乎原文吃光光，因為不重要。
重要的是，到底這位號稱「城市設計大師」的饒及人到底是誰？
估狗一下，好像只有百度的資料，好像叫做James Jao來著的。
你也知道，百度這東西的可信度實在...
既然還在紐約規劃局工作過，
那把James Jao跟City Planning Commission, NYC一起估狗，
結果跑出這樣一篇東西：
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/07/07/nyregion/neighborhood-report-rego-park-suspect-arrested-in-co-op-fraud.html
（抱歉不會縮網址）
NEIGHBORHOOD REPORT: REGO PARK;Suspect Arrested in Co-op Fraud
By JANE H. LIIJULY 7, 1996
社區新聞：合作住宅（co-op）詐騙案嫌犯被逮
He was once a prominent Asian-American in New York City politics.
Now, James C. Jao, a former City Planning Commissioner, sits in a
California jail awaiting extradition to New York to stand trial on
charges that he defrauded a co-op in Rego Park and jumped bail.
他曾是紐約著名的亞裔美國人政治家。James C. Jao，這位前都市計畫委員會
委員，如今卻待在加州監獄等待引渡回紐約受審一宗關於他在Rego Park合作
住宅涉嫌的詐騙案跟棄保潛逃。
Mary de Bourbon, a spokeswoman for the Queens District Attorney,
Richard A. Brown, said Mr. Jao had failed to appear for a May 13
court date and was arrested by United States Customs agents last
week in San Francisco after returning from a business trip to
China.
皇后區法定代理人Richard A. Brown的發言人Mary de Bourbon表示，
Jao因為沒有在五月十三號到庭，並且在上週從中國出差回美國時，在
舊金山被美國海關逮捕。
In June 1995, Mr. Jao, who owned two apartments in the Walden
Terrace complex on 64th Road in Rego Park, was indicted on 28
counts, including grand larceny. He is accused of defrauding the
co-op of $41,000 while serving as treasurer and president from
1989 to 1992.
1995年六月，在Rego Park的64th Road上擁有兩間公寓的Jao，被指控了28
件案子，包括了嚴重侵佔。他也被指控在1989至1992年擔任財管委員跟理事
長期間，從合作住宅那裡詐騙了4萬1千美元，
Mr. Jao is also accused of using $100,000 from the board's capital
budget as collateral for a personal line of credit, improperly
steering repair contracts to a company he owned and failing to
disclose the transactions to the Department of Investigation while
he was a planning commissioner. Mr. Jao offered to repay the $
41,000, but the board refused pending a civil lawsuit. If
convicted of grand larceny, Mr. Jao could face 15 years in prison.
Jao也被指控從理事會的基金裡挪用了十萬美金充當個人信用額度的擔保，
並不正當地將維修合約委託給他自己所有的公司，並且在他擔任計畫委員
時，還沒能對調查部門公開交易內容。Jaog試圖把4萬1千美元還回去，但
是理事會卻拒絕待決訴訟。假如被判有罪，Jao將面臨15年牢獄之災。
Ms. de Bourbon said that although prosecutors had asked Mr. Jao to
surrender his passport, his lawyers persuaded Justice Vincent F.
Naro of State Supreme Court in Queens to allow him to travel to
China because of his substantial business interests there. Since
the early 1990's, Mr. Jao has been one of the leading foreign
businessmen in China, helping build skyscrapers and design a
transportation system.
de Bourbon表示，雖然檢察官曾經問Jao是否交出護照，Jao的律師卻說服了
州高等法院法官Vincent F. Naro，表示他的客戶在中國有生意往來所以必
須出差。從1990年開始，Jao就已經是中國的外籍標竿生意人之一，並且蓋了
許多摩天大樓跟設計了運輸系統。
Mr. Brown's office said Mr. Jao had kept previous court dates and
had advised prosecutors of his travel plans up to April 30. Mr.
Jao was declared a fugitive after failing to show up on May 13.
Ms. de Bourbon said that in addition to forfeiting the $25,000
bond he had posted, Mr. Jao would be charged with bail jumping.
Barry J.Teller, a lawyer for Mr. Jao, declined to comment.
Mr. Jao came to prominence in the Koch administration and was
widely praised for his role in the first comprehensive zoning and
planning study of Chinatown and the first zoning study of downtown
Flushing. After leaving public office, Mr. Jao remained active in
politics, counseling city and state officials and helping them
foster economic ties with Asian countries. JANE H. LII
Richard Brown辦公室表示，Jao之前都還能準時出庭並且告訴檢察官
他的出差旅程到四月三十號，因為沒能在五月十三號出庭，所以Jao
被認定逃亡。de Bourbon表示，除了2萬5千元的保釋金被沒入外，Jao
還被另外起訴棄保潛逃。Jao的律師Barry J. Teller對此則拒絕評論。
Jao在郭德華市長任內展露頭角，並且因為他在first comprehensive
都市分區計劃裡以及在唐人街跟法拉盛地區的都市分區計劃的角色而
備受讚譽。離開公職後，Jao依舊活躍政壇，並在市政顧問等職上協助
搭建起與亞洲國家的經濟連結。
====================================
1.先聲明，不知道這位James Jao是不是就是中天新聞裡的大師，
坦白說，我個人覺得最好不是。雖然官司也許平安下莊，
但畢竟還是有爭議。
2.很厲害啊，1990年就已經在中國搞建築跟都市計畫，
剛好韓市長現在要引進陸資買房子，找這人來，剛剛好。
3.換個角度想，韓市長都說聖人難找了，
找這位老兄來，如果真的是這位老兄，可能也是蠻不錯的。
4.另外要解釋一下，co-op這個概念台灣不知道有沒有，
基本上就是地主把房子拿出來充當合作住宅，不以營利為目的，
而是讓社經條件比較弱勢的人，以負擔得起的方式共同承租物業。
有理想一點的co-op，房客甚至會組織直接民主性質的管理委員會，
每個禮拜開家庭會議，共同採買、共同消費
簡單說來，就是台灣最近在吵的公共國宅的更理想化的版本。
小弟在米帝住過一年多，好的壞的看得不少，
如果連這種公共住宅計畫都能擠得出油水，
那這位James Jao真的是不簡單的人物。
5.希望我翻譯這篇新聞，不會擋了Jao先生的財路。
所以，我需要發一個不自殺聲明嗎？
應該不用吧，這篇新聞有說Jao的好話，我也有照實翻譯出來喔。