1.三公報是歷史文件
2.美國果然很會留一手
原文：
https://goo.gl/HQp7HT
P13頁
Q：你支持美艦泊台嗎？支持台艦泊美嗎？
如果是的話，請說明要如何符合美國長期的一中政策下來軍艦泊港？
還有請說明泊港讓台美有何實質的利益？
I have been on the record in published articles supporting both U.S. Navy
Ship visits to Taiwan,
as well as Taiwan navy ship visits to the United States.
Such port calls would be entirely
consistent with our One China Policy as we define it.
我已公開表示支持這個美艦泊台與台艦泊美的議題
這種泊港的方式將完全符合我們美國所定義下的一中政策
We already have occasional U.S. military flights land in Taiwan,
and have had Taiwan military aircraft land in the United States.
We have active duty members of the U.S. military permanently assigned to Taiwan.
我們美國的軍機先前就偶而臨停在台灣，台灣的軍機也停在美國過
我們現役的美軍長期派駐台灣
Since we reserve forourselves the right to define our own One China Policy,
commencing U.S. ship visits to Taiwan
and vice versa can be included.
The benefits of U.S. port calls to Taiwan would fall into the
traditional justification for port calls to any other friendly country in the
world – rest and
relaxation for the sailors (which aids in recruitment and retention);
minor repair and maintenance;
port familiarization to assist in planning for a known
contingency; and to support
o
ur political goals of supporting Taiwan and deterring China.
If there are alternate views in theDepartment of Defense,
I look forward to learning more about the counter arguments.