Re: [問卦]颱風損光電設施 再生能源20%不可能的任務?

作者: fredjedi (宏哥)   2016-10-23 10:25:50
同場加映.先說結論
使用每天上班不到8小時又高薪約聘的風光發電.來取代.
幾乎不休息又廉價穩定的核電.真的是超級腦殘
效率超過平均的只有燃煤.核能與台電燃氣
104年容量因素 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 平均
台電公司 56% 50% 58% 58% 64% 70% 73% 70% 64% 64% 61% 59% 62%
抽蓄水力 13% 12% 13% 12% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 13% 13% 13% 13%
火力 56% 50% 61% 66% 75% 77% 81% 75% 74% 67% 68% 68% 68%
燃油 14% 20% 28% 32% 58% 47% 49% 35% 28% 31% 43% 49% 36%
燃煤 86% 75% 86% 86% 82% 90% 95% 96% 98% 80% 88% 90% 88%
燃氣 48% 42% 54% 62% 75% 78% 82% 73% 71% 69% 62% 59% 65%
核能 90% 81% 86% 67% 60% 86% 89% 86% 63% 89% 73% 57% 77%
再生能源 18% 16% 18% 16% 21% 30% 20% 44% 34% 34% 21% 17% 24%
慣常水力 12% 13% 16% 14% 22% 33% 19% 49% 37% 35% 19% 12% 23%
風力 52% 35% 33% 29% 15% 15% 22% 12% 21% 32% 30% 49% 29%
太陽能 18% 17% 15% 19% 16% 20% 18% 14% 13% 16% 15% 13% 16%
購電 62% 47% 59% 60% 68% 70% 70% 61% 65% 61% 53% 57% 61%
民營火力 61% 44% 57% 62% 71% 68% 67% 56% 61% 59% 50% 53% 59%
燃煤 88% 61% 76% 84% 90% 92% 91% 75% 87% 76% 69% 74% 80%
燃氣 43% 33% 43% 46% 58% 52% 51% 43% 44% 48% 37% 39% 45%
再生能源 33% 31% 29% 25% 26% 30% 33% 38% 32% 31% 28% 29% 30%
承攬水力 10% 17% 12% 3% 15% 17% 35% 70% 48% 51% 32% 10% 26%
民營水力 5% 31% 30% 14% 21% 32% 49% 59% 40% 59% 40% 4% 32%
民營風力 43% 28% 27% 24% 16% 18% 21% 15% 22% 31% 26% 47% 26%
民營太陽能 10% 16% 12% 17% 19% 23% 17% 22% 19% 16% 16% 13% 17%
民營生質能 - - - - - 62% 67% 45% 36% 38% 8% 10% 38%
垃圾、沼氣 54% 51% 50% 42% 42% 49% 53% 52% 48% 38% 39% 44% 47%
歲修停機.政治停機亦列入計算
http://www.taipower.com.tw/content/govern/govern04.aspx
作者: a1091100075 (小日本)   2016-10-23 10:27:00
你的論點假如從商業模式繞過去後 就不成立了啦
作者: lucifiel1618 (Lucifiel)   2016-10-23 10:27:00
不考慮從商業模式繞過去嗎
作者: smalltwo (獎金獵人)   2016-10-23 10:29:00
怎解決.只有一個法子呀.要生產20度的電就蓋60度的機具把所謂的備載拉到50%~80%就可能也許大概可以替代
作者: Anvec (鄉民)   2016-10-23 10:32:00
問題是以前為了鬥台電 某些人告訴大家備轉容量率15% 太高了可是現實是 如果要搞再生能源 備轉容量率要撐到很高
作者: fredjedi (宏哥)   2016-10-23 10:34:00
政客與笨蛋誤國務民阿
作者: suntex01 (tears in my heart)   2016-10-23 10:35:00
核電廉價。。。科科。
作者: smalltwo (獎金獵人)   2016-10-23 10:36:00
廉價與否要看跟誰比較.真實的成本其實與火力差不多

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com