[新聞] 澄清柯P沒參與器官仲介 葛特曼律師回函

作者: Onslaught ( )   2014-11-27 20:51:14
1.媒體來源:TVBS
2.完整新聞標題:
澄清柯P沒參與器官仲介 葛特曼律師回函中英全文
3.完整新聞內文:
針對美國作家伊森葛特曼(Ethan Gutmann)出版的著作「大屠殺」提及無黨籍台北市長候
選人柯文哲曾到中國取得人體器官,柯辦律師袁秀慧今(27日)拿出代表葛特曼的安世立律
師事務所回函,表示昨天已收到這封回函,回函中說明柯文哲從來不曾執行器官仲介,也
不曾透過中國器官市場進行獲利。聲明稿檢附英文回函原文件以及中文翻譯。
葛特曼律師回函中文翻譯:
請諒解我們的回應時間,超過了您當初於11月4日信中,我們所承諾的三週期限數日。我
們對於柯醫師的疑慮非常認真地看待,且我們已經詳閱所有書中相關頁面並檢視當時撰寫
依據的面談紀錄與文件。
我們認為,在台灣媒體上全面性的誤解與魯莽的指控,是因為Gutmann書中的英文與相關
頁面被翻譯成中文過後,因為語言與文化的差異所造成的理解問題。
我們相信所有的誤解都會在中文版的The Slaughter中被澄清,其中會包含未收錄在英文
版中的序言,會直接回應柯文哲醫師的疑慮。為了讓事情更明朗,我們必須要指出,對於
書中225頁的理解,完全沒有英語語系的評論家,有著跟第一語言是華語的台灣讀者有著
相同解釋。
在您給Gutmann先生的信件中,您對於255頁的敘述「所有器官都是來自於法輪功」有特別
的疑慮。這本書有透過三位專業讀者同儕審查,且經Prometheus冗長的內部編輯過程,不
僅包含文字內容,更須檢視作者的筆記、訪談的錄音帶以及電子溝通。
沒有任何英語系的讀者會將標題或是文字內容解讀為,柯文哲可從類似私人「器官仲介」
交易的形式取得法輪功器官,只會解讀為柯文哲醫師是被告知資訊的。迄今沒有任何英語
系讀者曾經將柯文哲醫師解讀為器官仲介者。
迄今也沒有任何英語系讀者相信,柯文哲醫師曾試圖自行購買器官或是以任何形式參與營
利行為。相反地,多數讀者讚揚柯醫師對於調查的貢獻。審查人員們均一致地如此回應,
就像是觀眾們在華盛頓特區National Endowment for Democracy中舉辦的The Slaughter
書本發表會的反應一樣。
我們相信語言、翻譯以及在台北市市長選舉中激昂的政治環境,會導致大家誤會作者的意
思並讓事情變得更模糊。然而我們將全力確保在中文版的The Slaughter會越準確越好。
總而言之,我們重申我們認為台灣媒體對於柯文哲醫師以及Gutmann先生的對待是不公平
的。Gutmann先生相信且我們認為他的書所闡述的是,柯文哲醫師的舉止高尚,柯文哲醫
師從來不曾執行器官仲介,他也從來不曾透過中國器官市場進行獲利,且他對於揭露目前
仍在中國進行的醫療犯罪行為有著重大國際級的貢獻,柯文哲醫師的行為是令人驕傲的。
葛特曼律師英文回函:
Re: Your Letter to Mr. Gutmann on October
Please excuse us for having exceeded by a few days the three week time period
within which we had agreed to expand upon our earlier letter to you of
November 4.
We take Dr. Ko's concerns very seriously and we have reviewed the relevant
pages in his book together with our own records of interviews and notes on
which those pages were based.
We have concluded that the entire misunderstanding and the reckless
accusations which have appeared in the Taiwan media would appear to be based
on language and cultural differences between the English in Mr. Gutmann's
book, on the one hand, and the understanding of the relevant pages when the
latter have been rendered into Chinese.
We believe that all misunderstandings will be clarified in the Chinese
edition of The Slaughter, which will contain a special preface not included
in the English edition. This preface will address Dr. Ko's concerns directly.
For greater clarity, we would like to point out that no English speaking
reviewer of the book has understood page 255 in the way it has apparently
been understood in Taiwan by readers whose first language is Chinese.
In your letter to Mr. Gutmann, you specifically mentioned the caption on page
255 reading "All the Organs will come from Falun Gong" as a particular
concern.
This book was peer-reviewed by three expert readers and subjected to a
lengthy internal editing process by Prometheus. This review included not only
the text itself, but also the author's notes, interview tapes, and electronic
communications.
No English-speaking reader has understood the caption or the text to mean
anything other than that Dr. Ko was being given information, rather than
making a statement about the availability of Falun Gong organs in some sort
of personal "organ broker" deal.
No English-speaking reader to date has understood for one moment that Dr. Ko
was acting as an "organ broker".
No English-speaking reader to date believes that Dr. Ko was trying to
purchase organs himself or was in any way involved in any sort of
profit-making venture.
On the contrary, most readers have praised Dr. Ko for his contribution to the
investigation. Reviewers have responded similarly, as did the audience at the
author's book launch at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington DC.
We believe that language, translation, and the heated environment of the
political campaign for the mayoral race in Taipei may be playing a role in
misconstruing the author's intentions and clouding the issue.
Nonetheless we are interested in ensuring that the Chinese edition of The
Slaughter is as accurate as possible.
In conclusion, we reiterate that we think the Taiwan media has been unfair in
its treatment of both Dr. Ko and Mr. Gutmann. Mr. Gutmann believes, and we
think his book demonstrates, that Dr. Ko has acted honourably, that he has
never been an organ broker, that he has never sought profit through China's
organ marketing, and that he has contributed significantly to the
international effort to expose the medical crimes which continue to be
perpetrated in China.
Yours Truly
Clive Ansley
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/556179
5.備註:
※ 一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞,被刪或自刪也算額度內,超貼者劣文,請注意
作者: god060119 (心之所向 身之所往)   2014-11-27 20:52:00
作者: shadowmoo (啥都悶)   2014-11-27 20:53:00
連營:自導自演
作者: WalkFish (Wayne)   2014-11-27 20:53:00
為了一個選舉,被老外嗆英文爛
作者: oglms (神米來當教練吧!)   2014-11-27 20:55:00
自導自演!!
作者: LABOYS (洛城浪子)   2014-11-27 20:55:00
反之,連除了會去兔女郎趴,他還會什麼?
作者: hatenese (遇到 ,嗯)   2014-11-27 20:55:00
這麼多天才回喔XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
作者: kairi5217 (左手)   2014-11-27 20:57:00
又增加台灣能見度了 勝文果然最有國際觀
作者: YahooTaiwan (超可愛南西我老婆)   2014-11-27 20:59:00
違反選罷法,不排除提出國際告訴
作者: only3v (我有一雙堅強的眼睛)   2014-11-27 21:01:00
藍營抹黑的手法,多到可以出一本書
作者: wonder007 ( )   2014-11-27 21:05:00
這麼多天才回是人家還做了同儕審查以證明事實
作者: Leoreo   2014-11-27 21:11:00
某偽人權律師:
作者: Z55T (1122)   2014-11-27 21:20:00
只會都說D PP丟臉丟到國外,,這次選舉,KMT屢被國外打臉。

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com