While there are many other reasons to explore other battery chemistries,
justifying research on other battery chemistries in the name of avoiding the
economic issues associated with lithium is misguided; Lithium is plentiful,
has little impact on battery cell and pack costs, and is here to stay.
這句話是某篇論文結論最後一點，看不太懂，麻煩幫忙翻譯一下，感激不進~

意思是：鋰數量多，對電池外殼及包裝成本影響很小，它不會被淘汰.

出於鋰元素的經濟考量(成本高)而去考慮其他種的電池可能性(不同的化學反應)是錯誤的考量 因為鋰元素實際上還很多 不用擔心它變貴

謝謝您的幫忙~若方便的話，能否解釋一下怎麼翻的?因為跟表面單字有點差距