韓版FB原文丟GOOGLE翻譯照登
Hello, this is Dodo.
Recently, the issue of 'Degrom' live card rating
It seems to be very hot among users of us.
I talked to the English people about it.
I did not make a formal announcement
Approximately, a starting pitcher who meets the following criteria:
I was giving a rare grade.
======================
1. Win 12 or more & less than 3.6 ERA
2. Win 13 or more & less than ERA 4.0
3. W 14 or more & ERA 5.0 or less
======================
MLB also has to give this player "CySim" as an issue
It was a loud run.
Magu Magu is based on classic criteria (wins, defense rate, etc.)
The principle is to grade cards.
KBO and MLB were similar.
But, like 'DiGrom', 'the bad luck'
Just undervaluing with classical grades
It does not seem appropriate.
How do you like the opinions of the users?
If you comment on the comments,
So that more convincing players can be rated
I'll do it.
Thank you. ^^
大意是說 很多玩家針對18deGrom卡色的問題議論紛紛
雖然不算正式的公布 但是WLB先發投手紅卡的標準大概是照以下規則給的
1. 12勝或以上 防禦率低於3.6
2. 13勝或以上 防禦率低於4
3. 14勝或以上 防禦率低於5
美國那邊對於deGrom能不能得賽揚獎這個話題也一直延燒
韓版原則上會基於以上標準對卡牌進行評分
但是像deGrom這種地獄倒楣鬼類型的球員
基於以上這種原則而低估了他的卡色
覺得越想越不對勁
你的意見如何? 可以說看看
如果有強大的說服力 我們會做的